Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Schlicht, Henning

  • Google
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Long-Term In Vivo Response of a Polyurethane Gastric Implant for Treating Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Diseases: A Comparison of Different Surface Treatments2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Schneider, Armin
1 / 1 shared
Feussner, Hubertus
1 / 1 shared
Eblenkamp, Markus
1 / 1 shared
Wilhelm, Dirk
1 / 1 shared
Doundoulakis, Emmanouil
1 / 1 shared
Wintermantel, Erich
1 / 4 shared
Wu, Hongbin
1 / 1 shared
Haugen, Håvard Jostein
1 / 19 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Schneider, Armin
  • Feussner, Hubertus
  • Eblenkamp, Markus
  • Wilhelm, Dirk
  • Doundoulakis, Emmanouil
  • Wintermantel, Erich
  • Wu, Hongbin
  • Haugen, Håvard Jostein
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Long-Term In Vivo Response of a Polyurethane Gastric Implant for Treating Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Diseases: A Comparison of Different Surface Treatments

  • Schneider, Armin
  • Feussner, Hubertus
  • Eblenkamp, Markus
  • Wilhelm, Dirk
  • Doundoulakis, Emmanouil
  • Wintermantel, Erich
  • Wu, Hongbin
  • Haugen, Håvard Jostein
  • Schlicht, Henning
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Gastro oesophagael reflux disease (GORD) is common in the Western hemisphere. Patients with regurgitated reflux are typically treated with fundoplication surgery. We present a newly designed polyurethane implant which passively aids the sphincter in reducing gastric fluids within the oesophagus. The gastric implant has an open porous inner side which allows for tissue ingrowth from the oesophagus and thus allows for fixation around the sphincter. In addition, a device for minimally invasive surgery of this implant was developed and used in a pig model. The unmodified GORD implant was placed around the pig’s oesophagus with unsatisfactory results, leading to insufficient fixation at the implantation site and scarring tissue leading to dysphagia. In addition, two surface modifications, plasma activation and TiO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> deposition were used to improve the implant’s host tissue response. The biocompatibility effects of the surface treatments and sterilisation method on the implant were investigated in vitro and in vivo. In vitro tests found that the plasma activation and TiO2 deposition have effectively enhanced the surface hydrophilicity and, consequently, the cell response to the implant. In addition, the gamma sterilisation harmed the plasma-activated implant. The plasma activation was more effective than TiO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> deposition as a surface treatment method for improving the tissue response of this implant in vivo. In addition, the in vivo experiment proved tissue ingrowth as deep as 1 mm into the porous structure of the implant. The GORD implants were encapsulated wholly in fibrous tissue; however, the capsule thickness diminished over time. Finally, the TiO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>-coated implants showed the poorest histocompatibility, contradictory to the in vitro findings. This study shows that it is possible to produce a plasma-treated porous polyurethane gastric implant that allows for fibrous tissue ingrowth, reduced in vivo encapsulation, and enhanced chemical properties.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Graphical Abstract</jats:bold></jats:p><jats:p>Model of the implant with an inner porous and an outer non-porous surface. The hypothesis was that the porous surface allows for fibroblastic infiltration into the porous structure (A) and fixation by scarring at the point of implantation, the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS). The outer side is smooth (B), which hinders neighbouring tissue attachments. In addition, a Nitinol ring (C) aids the implant in exerting pressure around the LOS, thus reducing sphincter volume. In addition, this metal ring aids visualisation with, e.g. X-ray or CT during post-therapy follow-ups. The open, flexible design eases the freeing of the ring in a stretched position and placement around the cardia (D-F). The internal diameter of 28 mm prevents stenosis but markedly reinforces the lower oesophagal sphincter. In addition, its size allows for minimally invasive surgery.</jats:p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • porous
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • experiment
  • biocompatibility
  • ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy
  • plasma activation