Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Vahdati, Mahdi

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 27

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Modeling and Optimization of the Yield Strength and Tensile Strength of Al7075 Butt Joint Produced by FSW and SFSW Using RSM and Desirability Function Method27citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Shamsborhan, Mahmoud
1 / 12 shared
Moradi, Mahmoud
1 / 83 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Shamsborhan, Mahmoud
  • Moradi, Mahmoud
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Modeling and Optimization of the Yield Strength and Tensile Strength of Al7075 Butt Joint Produced by FSW and SFSW Using RSM and Desirability Function Method

  • Shamsborhan, Mahmoud
  • Moradi, Mahmoud
  • Vahdati, Mahdi
Abstract

Friction stir welding (FSW) is introduced as a solid-state welding process. Despite the many benefits of the FSW, the effects of the thermal cycles in this process are causing softening of the joint. This phenomenon generally occurs in heat-treatable aluminum alloys and results in reduced mechanical properties of the joint. To solve this limitation, submerged friction stir welding (SFSW) has been developed which is suitable for welding of heat-sensitive alloys. In this study, 31 butt joints were first produced from Al7075-T6 using the FSW. For this purpose, the response surface methodology was selected as the design of experiments method, and the variables: tool rotational speed, tool feed rate, tool shoulder diameter, and tool tilt angle were determined as the input variables. Then, the statistical analysis of the parameters affecting the yield strength and tensile strength of the joints was investigated. Then, 10 joints were produced using the SFSW based on the optimal values of the tool feed rate and tool tilt angle. Results of the ANOVA and regression analysis of the experimental data confirmed the accuracy and precision of regression equations and showed that the linear, interactional and quadratic terms of tool shoulder diameter and tool rotational speed effect on the yield strength and ultimate tensile strength of submerged joints. Also, the optimal conditions of input variables were determined by the desirability method and confirmed by the verification test.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • experiment
  • aluminium
  • strength
  • yield strength
  • tensile strength