Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Novak, Maja Dolenc

  • Google
  • 1
  • 23
  • 37

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Functional compared to anatomical imaging in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease: An international, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (IAEA-SPECT/CTA study)37citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Patel, Chetan
1 / 1 shared
Jug, Borut
1 / 1 shared
Devasenapathy, Niveditha
1 / 1 shared
Kraft, Otakar
1 / 1 shared
Alexanderson, Erick
1 / 1 shared
Ozkan, Elgin
1 / 1 shared
Sharma, Saket
1 / 1 shared
Purohit, Gaurav
1 / 1 shared
Meave, Aloha
1 / 1 shared
Trevethan, Sergio
1 / 1 shared
Kashyap, Ravi
1 / 1 shared
Zier, Sandra
1 / 1 shared
Gotthardtová, Lucia
1 / 1 shared
Jonszta, Tomáš
1 / 1 shared
Altin, Timucin
1 / 1 shared
Soydal, Cigdem
1 / 1 shared
Paez, Diana
1 / 2 shared
Dondi, Maurizio
1 / 2 shared
Karthikeyan, Ganesan
1 / 3 shared
Gulati, Gurpreet
1 / 1 shared
Cerci, Rodrigo
1 / 2 shared
Vitola, Joao
1 / 2 shared
Salobir, Barbara Guzic
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Patel, Chetan
  • Jug, Borut
  • Devasenapathy, Niveditha
  • Kraft, Otakar
  • Alexanderson, Erick
  • Ozkan, Elgin
  • Sharma, Saket
  • Purohit, Gaurav
  • Meave, Aloha
  • Trevethan, Sergio
  • Kashyap, Ravi
  • Zier, Sandra
  • Gotthardtová, Lucia
  • Jonszta, Tomáš
  • Altin, Timucin
  • Soydal, Cigdem
  • Paez, Diana
  • Dondi, Maurizio
  • Karthikeyan, Ganesan
  • Gulati, Gurpreet
  • Cerci, Rodrigo
  • Vitola, Joao
  • Salobir, Barbara Guzic
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Functional compared to anatomical imaging in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease: An international, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (IAEA-SPECT/CTA study)

  • Patel, Chetan
  • Jug, Borut
  • Devasenapathy, Niveditha
  • Kraft, Otakar
  • Alexanderson, Erick
  • Ozkan, Elgin
  • Sharma, Saket
  • Purohit, Gaurav
  • Meave, Aloha
  • Trevethan, Sergio
  • Kashyap, Ravi
  • Zier, Sandra
  • Gotthardtová, Lucia
  • Jonszta, Tomáš
  • Altin, Timucin
  • Soydal, Cigdem
  • Paez, Diana
  • Dondi, Maurizio
  • Karthikeyan, Ganesan
  • Gulati, Gurpreet
  • Novak, Maja Dolenc
  • Cerci, Rodrigo
  • Vitola, Joao
  • Salobir, Barbara Guzic
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p> To test the hypothesis that, in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) would result in less downstream testing than coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>In this international, randomized trial, mildly symptomatic patients with an intermediate likelihood of having CAD, and asymptomatic patients at intermediate risk of cardiac events, underwent either initial stress-rest MPI or CCTA. The primary outcome was downstream noninvasive or invasive testing at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included cumulative effective radiation dose (ERD) and costs at 12 months.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>We recruited 303 patients (151 MPI and 152 CTA) from 6 centers in 6 countries. The initial MPI was abnormal in 29% (41/143) and CCTA in 56% (79/141) of patients. Fewer patients undergoing initial stress-rest MPI had further downstream testing at 6 months (adjusted OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.91, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.023). There was a small increase in the median cumulative ERD with MPI (9.6 vs. 8.8 mSv, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.04), but no difference in costs between the two strategies at 12 months.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> In the management of patients with suspected CAD, a strategy of initial stress MPI is substantially less likely to require further downstream testing than initial testing with CCTA. Trial registration: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://clinicaltrials.gov">clinicaltrials.gov</jats:ext-link> identification number NCT01368770.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • size-exclusion chromatography
  • chemical ionisation
  • collision-induced dissociation