Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wiehler, L.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Influence of Ductility on Fracture in Tensile Testing of Cold Gas Sprayed Deposits7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Klassen, T.
1 / 66 shared
Gärtner, F.
1 / 10 shared
Gieseler, C.-P.
1 / 1 shared
Schulze, M.
1 / 9 shared
Huang, C.
1 / 9 shared
List, A.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Klassen, T.
  • Gärtner, F.
  • Gieseler, C.-P.
  • Schulze, M.
  • Huang, C.
  • List, A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Influence of Ductility on Fracture in Tensile Testing of Cold Gas Sprayed Deposits

  • Klassen, T.
  • Wiehler, L.
  • Gärtner, F.
  • Gieseler, C.-P.
  • Schulze, M.
  • Huang, C.
  • List, A.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Cold gas spraying nowadays receives much interest for additive manufacturing due to its high deposition rate. Associated structural applications define high requirements regarding mechanical properties and failure tolerances. Up to present, micro-flat tensile (MFT) or tubular coating tensile (TCT) tests are well-established for determining deposit strengths. Due to particular stress states during testing, both provide slightly different information. While MFT tests can provide information on strain and ductility, stress concentration in TCT tests requires to apply a notch factor for calculating the ultimate tensile strength. Here, we suggest that a suitable combination of both tests can provide additional information about tolerances against local stress concentrations in crack initiation and growth. Taking titanium and copper as model systems, results from MFT and TCT tests are evaluated over a wide range of spray parameter sets into regimes that allow for high deposit qualities, even reaching certain ductility. The correlation between the results reveals that the derived stress concentration sensitivity depends on the deposit quality and could eventually decrease to unity. In turn, the correlation to respective strain to failure data can supply information on underlying deformation mechanisms. These preliminary results thus provide strategies for tuning deposit toughness and give prerequisites for quality forecasts.</jats:p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • crack
  • strength
  • copper
  • titanium
  • tensile strength
  • deformation mechanism
  • ductility
  • additive manufacturing