Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Qin, Zhaoye

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 14

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022An experimental and metamodeling approach to tensile properties of natural fibers composites14citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Asmael, Mohammed
1 / 39 shared
Zeeshan, Qasim
1 / 9 shared
Alhijazi, Mohamad
1 / 5 shared
Harb, Mohammad
1 / 3 shared
Safaei, Babak
1 / 13 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Asmael, Mohammed
  • Zeeshan, Qasim
  • Alhijazi, Mohamad
  • Harb, Mohammad
  • Safaei, Babak
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

An experimental and metamodeling approach to tensile properties of natural fibers composites

  • Asmael, Mohammed
  • Zeeshan, Qasim
  • Qin, Zhaoye
  • Alhijazi, Mohamad
  • Harb, Mohammad
  • Safaei, Babak
Abstract

<p>The present work presents an analysis of the tensile properties of Palm as well as Luffa natural fiber composites (NFC) in high density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene (PP), Epoxy, and Ecopoxy (BioPoxy 36) matrixes, taking into consideration the effect of fibers volume fraction variation. Finite element analysis i.e. representative volume element (RVE) model with chopped random fiber orientation was utilized for predicting the elastic properties. Tensile test following ASTM D3039 standard was conducted. Artificial neural network, multiple linear regression, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and support vector machine were implemented for defining the design space upon the considered parameters and evaluating the reliability of these machine learning approaches in predicting the tensile strength of natural fibers composites. Furthermore, BioPoxy 36 with 0.3 luffa fibers exhibited the highest tensile strength. Finite element analysis (FEA) findings profusely agreed with the experimental results. ANFIS Machine Learning (ML) tool showed least prediction error in predicting tensile strength of natural fibers composites.</p>

Topics
  • density
  • strength
  • composite
  • random
  • tensile strength
  • finite element analysis
  • machine learning