Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hiratsuka, Kota

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Investigation of group 13 elements as potential candidates for p-type dopants in the narrow-gap thermoelectric semiconductor α-SrSi21citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Shiojiri, Daishi
1 / 1 shared
Takahashi, Shinta
1 / 1 shared
Iida, Tsutomu
1 / 1 shared
Hirayama, Naomi
1 / 2 shared
Yamaguchi, Masato
1 / 1 shared
Imai, Motoharu
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Shiojiri, Daishi
  • Takahashi, Shinta
  • Iida, Tsutomu
  • Hirayama, Naomi
  • Yamaguchi, Masato
  • Imai, Motoharu
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Investigation of group 13 elements as potential candidates for p-type dopants in the narrow-gap thermoelectric semiconductor α-SrSi2

  • Shiojiri, Daishi
  • Takahashi, Shinta
  • Hiratsuka, Kota
  • Iida, Tsutomu
  • Hirayama, Naomi
  • Yamaguchi, Masato
  • Imai, Motoharu
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To investigate the possibility of <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>-type doping of α-SrSi<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>, a promising as an eco-friendly thermoelectric material, the energy changes of substitutions of the Si site of α-SrSi<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> by group 13 elements were evaluated using first-principles calculations. It is found that Ga doping was the most energetically favorable dopant while In is the most unfavorable. We examined the synthesis of Ga- and In-doped α-SrSi<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> using the vertical Bridgeman method and investigated their thermoelectric properties. The Ga atoms were doped to α-SrSi<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> successfully up to 1.0 at. %, while In atoms could not be doped as suggested by calculations. For experimental prepared Ga-doped samples, the carrier density was observed to increase with Ga doping, from 3.58 × 10<jats:sup>19</jats:sup> cm<jats:sup>−3</jats:sup> for undoped α-SrSi<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> to 4.49 × 10<jats:sup>20</jats:sup> cm<jats:sup>−3</jats:sup> for a 1.0 at. % Ga-doped sample at 300 K. The temperature dependence of carrier concentrations was observed to change from negative to positive with increasing Ga content. In addition, the temperature dependence of the Seebeck coefficient was also observed to change from negative to positive with increasing Ga content. The results indicate that α-SrSi<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> undergoes a semiconductor–metal transition with Ga doping. The power factor for the undoped sample was quite high, at 2.5 mW/mK<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, while the sample with 0.3 at. % Ga had a value of 1.1 mW/mK<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> at room temperature.</jats:p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • semiconductor