Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Araujo, Ad

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 13

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020In vitro assessment of polyethylene glycol and polyvinylpyrrolidone as hydrophilic additives on bioseparation by polysulfone membranes13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Solich, P.
1 / 1 shared
Montenegro, Mcbsm
1 / 7 shared
Amorim, Cg
1 / 2 shared
Santos Silva, A.
1 / 19 shared
Kohlova, M.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Solich, P.
  • Montenegro, Mcbsm
  • Amorim, Cg
  • Santos Silva, A.
  • Kohlova, M.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

In vitro assessment of polyethylene glycol and polyvinylpyrrolidone as hydrophilic additives on bioseparation by polysulfone membranes

  • Araujo, Ad
  • Solich, P.
  • Montenegro, Mcbsm
  • Amorim, Cg
  • Santos Silva, A.
  • Kohlova, M.
Abstract

Considering the continuous increment of morbidity in patients with renal disease, the improvement of polymeric membranes characteristics for haemodialysis is a challenging issue. The efficient removal of middle size uremic toxins, as well as biocompatibility is crucial characteristics to ameliorate chronic kidney disease patients' outcomes. In this study, polysulfone membranes with different hydrophilic additives, molecular weight and concentrations were prepared by spin coating method, followed by phase inversion via immersion precipitation. The removal of urea, lysozyme and bovine serum albumin was studied using a miniaturized flow system, mimicking haemodialysis conditions. The optimal composition was 15.0 wt% of polysulfone and 2.5 wt% of polyvinylpyrrolidone K30. This selected membrane was fully permeable for urea, showed up to 50% rejection of lysozyme and very high rejection of albumin. The additive PVP K30 played important role in the improvement of porosity, without compromising the mechanical strength of the membrane. The biocompatibility of membrane was evaluated by material-induced haemolysis and platelet activation tests. The platelet activation and haemolysis were negligible, compared to other biocompatible materials. These results confirmed the haemocompatibility of the optimized membrane. Therefore, the membrane is not expected to modulate the biological response, when used for the haemodialysis treatment.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • phase
  • strength
  • precipitation
  • activation
  • porosity
  • molecular weight
  • biocompatibility
  • spin coating