Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wagih, A.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 15

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020On the experimental determination of the J-curve of quasi-brittle composite materials15citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Blanco, N.
1 / 4 shared
Camanho, Pp
1 / 229 shared
Ortega, A.
1 / 2 shared
Xavier, J.
1 / 35 shared
Maimi, P.
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Blanco, N.
  • Camanho, Pp
  • Ortega, A.
  • Xavier, J.
  • Maimi, P.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

On the experimental determination of the J-curve of quasi-brittle composite materials

  • Wagih, A.
  • Blanco, N.
  • Camanho, Pp
  • Ortega, A.
  • Xavier, J.
  • Maimi, P.
Abstract

Four different methods to experimentally determine the J-curve of quasi-brittle materials are analysed and discussed in this work. The first two-methods measure the integral of the cohesive law, J (omega), from an initial notch. However, the correct definition of the notch geometry is of critical importance for an accurate identification of the cohesive law. The other two methods measure J (omega) when the crack is propagating with a fully-developed cohesive zone. In this case, the cohesive law is obtained by determining the crack opening displacement along the fracture process zone without requiring information about the geometry of the initial notch. The four methods are discussed highlighting the corresponding advantages, limitations and required experimental results. Then, the results of the four methods are compared and validated by considering the experimental results of the Compact Tension test of a quasi-isotropic carbon fibre composite laminate. Finally, some recommendations are given on which of the four methods is the most appropriate to characterise the material J (omega) law based on the available measuring techniques.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • crack
  • composite
  • isotropic
  • tension test