People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Allen, Gr
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (1/1 displayed)
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Phenology, synchrony and host range of the Tasmanian population of <i>Cotesia urabae</i> introduced into New Zealand for the biocontrol of <i>Uraba lugens</i>
Abstract
The population dynamics of <i>Cotesia urabae</i> (Austin and Allen) (Braconidae: Microgastrinae), a biological control agent from Tasmania, and its eucalypt feeding host, <i>Uraba lugens</i> (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) was investigated prior to its introduction to New Zealand in 2011. Previous host range testing on potential New Zealand non-targets determined <i>C. urabae</i> had some potential to attack an endemic species, <i>Nyctemera annulata</i> (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). A closely related species in Tasmania, <i>Nyctemera amica</i>, was thus investigated as a potential host along with the native host <i>U. lugens</i>, to better understand the host range of <i>C. urabae</i> and the synchrony with its host in Tasmania. Adult <i>C. urabae</i> emerged from pupal cocoons in the field during January which confirmed a five month window in which its host, the larvae of <i>U. lugens</i>, was absent in the field. Experiments using sentinel <i>N. amica</i> and <i>U. lugens</i> larvae, field collections of <i>N. amica</i> and of larvae of other Lepidopteran species during this five month time window detected no parasitism by <i>C. urabae</i>. In the laboratory, host specificity testing showed reduced attack rates and no resultant <i>C. urabae</i> eggs or developing larvae or any successful pupation of <i>C. urabae</i> larvae from attacked <i>N. amica</i> larvae. It was concluded that <i>N. amica</i> is most unlikely to be a host for <i>C. urabae</i> in Tasmania and no evidence of any other alternative host was found.