Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Evans, D. Gareth

  • Google
  • 1
  • 11
  • 15

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Development of breast cancer choices15citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Foster, Claire
1 / 1 shared
Recio-Saucedo, Alejandra
1 / 1 shared
Wakefield, Claire E.
1 / 1 shared
Eccles, Diana M.
1 / 4 shared
Brooks, Charlotte
1 / 1 shared
Meiser, Bettina
1 / 2 shared
Cutress, Ramsey
1 / 1 shared
Armstrong, Anne
1 / 2 shared
Grimmett, Chloe
1 / 1 shared
Turner, Lesley
1 / 3 shared
Copson, Ellen
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Foster, Claire
  • Recio-Saucedo, Alejandra
  • Wakefield, Claire E.
  • Eccles, Diana M.
  • Brooks, Charlotte
  • Meiser, Bettina
  • Cutress, Ramsey
  • Armstrong, Anne
  • Grimmett, Chloe
  • Turner, Lesley
  • Copson, Ellen
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Development of breast cancer choices

  • Foster, Claire
  • Recio-Saucedo, Alejandra
  • Wakefield, Claire E.
  • Eccles, Diana M.
  • Brooks, Charlotte
  • Meiser, Bettina
  • Evans, D. Gareth
  • Cutress, Ramsey
  • Armstrong, Anne
  • Grimmett, Chloe
  • Turner, Lesley
  • Copson, Ellen
Abstract

Purpose: to develop a decision support tool for young women with breast cancer considering genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations soon after cancer diagnosis.Methods: a four-staged iterative development process was employed; stage 1 – literature review exploring the availability and efficacy of empirically tested decision support tools, stage 2 – in-depth interviews with 29 young women (<50 years) recently diagnosed with breast cancer, exploring information requirements and experiences of genetic testing decision making, stage 3 – three focus groups (N = 21) exploring preferences for information presentation and prioritisation of content, stage 4 - Think-aloud interviews to refine the prototype (N=16).Results: participants wanted information regarding the pros and cons of testing, the testing process and implications for their family, presented in a way that allowed them to choose the level of detail they required. They preferred the term ‘altered gene’, valued a medical word definition function and warnings before accessing sensitive information.Conclusion: participants valued the decision support tool, the accessibility of the information and its clinical endorsement. The decision support tool has considerable clinical utility as an adjunct to genetic counselling or for use in busy oncology clinics where formal genetic counselling may be unavailable.

Topics