People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Caversaccio, Marco D.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (3/3 displayed)
- 2023The acute vestibular syndrome: prevalence of new hearing loss and its diagnostic valuecitations
- 2022Paradigm shift in acute dizziness: is caloric testing obsolete?citations
- 2019Superficial Siderosis of the Central Nervous System: Neurotological Findings Related to Magnetic Resonance Imagingcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
The acute vestibular syndrome: prevalence of new hearing loss and its diagnostic value
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To assess the prevalence of new hearing losses in patients with acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) and to start to evaluate its diagnostic value for the differentiation between peripheral and central causes.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>We performed a cross-sectional prospective study in AVS patients presenting to our Emergency Department (ED) from February 2015 to November 2020. All patients received an MRI, Head-impulse test, Nystagmus test and Test of skew (‘HINTS’), caloric testing and a pure-tone audiometry.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>We assessed 71 AVS patients, 17 of whom had a central and 54 a peripheral cause of dizziness. 12.7% had an objective hearing loss. ‘HINTS’ had an accuracy of 78.9% to diagnose stroke, whereas ‘HINTS’ plus audiometry 73.2%. ‘HINTS’ sensitivity was 82.4% and specificity 77.8% compared to ‘HINTS’ plus audiometry showing a sensitivity of 82.4% and specificity of 70.4%. The four patients with stroke and minor stroke had all central ‘HINTS’. 55% of the patients did not perceive their new unilateral hearing loss.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>We found that almost one-eighth of the AVS patients had a new onset of hearing loss and only half had self-reported it. ‘HINTS’ plus audiometry proved to be less accurate to diagnose a central cause than ‘HINTS’ alone. Audiometry offered little diagnostic accuracy to detect strokes in the ED but might be useful to objectify a new hearing loss that was underestimated in the acute phase. Complete hearing loss should be considered a red flag, as three in four patients suffered from a central cause.</jats:p></jats:sec>