Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Adam, Hussaini

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 23

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Fabrication of gold nanorod–zinc oxide nanocomposite on gap-fingered integrated interdigitated aluminum electrodes and their response to electrolytes23citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ashokkumar, Thanganadar
1 / 1 shared
Azan, Mohammad Isa Ahmad
1 / 1 shared
Ramanathan, Santheraleka
1 / 6 shared
Adam, Tijjani
1 / 1 shared
Hashim, Uda
1 / 15 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ashokkumar, Thanganadar
  • Azan, Mohammad Isa Ahmad
  • Ramanathan, Santheraleka
  • Adam, Tijjani
  • Hashim, Uda
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Fabrication of gold nanorod–zinc oxide nanocomposite on gap-fingered integrated interdigitated aluminum electrodes and their response to electrolytes

  • Ashokkumar, Thanganadar
  • Adam, Hussaini
  • Azan, Mohammad Isa Ahmad
  • Ramanathan, Santheraleka
  • Adam, Tijjani
  • Hashim, Uda
Abstract

This study describes the fabrication of three different gap-fingered aluminum-interdigitated electrodes (AlIDEs) on the silicon substrate based on photolithographic method, followed by integration of the gold nanorod–zinc oxide nanocomposite. The IDE masks were designed using AutoCAD software with the gaps of 10, 20, and 30 μm for design 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The morphological and electrical characterizations were subsequently performed using 3D-nanoprofiler, atomic force microscopy, high-power microscopy (HPM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and I–V. Validation of the fabricated surfaces (AlIDEs with/without gold nanorod–zinc oxide nanocomposite) against the electrolytes was performed at different pHs which are ranging from 1 to 12. SEM revealed the following gaps, 18.4, 20, and 40.5 μm for bare 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The measurements on I–V for bare AlIDEs indicated the electrolyte influences at different pH solutions, which were almost similar in terms of current variations except at highly acidic and alkaline. AlIDEs were well fabricated and the smaller the gap displayed the better the sensitivity, hence device 1 AlIDE has a good performance. Using different pH solutions which ranging from pH 1–12, before and after AlIDEs were coated with zinc oxide and gold nanorod. The responses of the devices were similar, fluctuating from highly acidic region to highly alkaline region in the cases of AlIDEs bare 1 and 3. Bare 2 AlIDE displayed similar responses with the AlIDE that was deposited with gold nanorod. With these results, we can conclude that deposition of gold nanorod on the device brought about the orderly response to the different pH and with the increment from acidic to alkaline increases, the proportional changes with the current were noticed.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • nanocomposite
  • surface
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • atomic force microscopy
  • aluminium
  • zinc
  • gold
  • Silicon