Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Partap, S.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 67

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2007Preparation and characterisation of controlled porosity alginate hydrogels made via a simultaneous micelle templating and internal gelation process45citations
  • 2007Formation of porous natural-synthetic polymer composites using emulsion templating and supercritical fluid assisted impregnation22citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Darr, J. A.
2 / 14 shared
Muthutantri, A.
1 / 1 shared
Rehman, Ihtesham Ur
2 / 71 shared
Davis, G. R.
1 / 2 shared
Hebb, A. K.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Darr, J. A.
  • Muthutantri, A.
  • Rehman, Ihtesham Ur
  • Davis, G. R.
  • Hebb, A. K.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Formation of porous natural-synthetic polymer composites using emulsion templating and supercritical fluid assisted impregnation

  • Darr, J. A.
  • Rehman, Ihtesham Ur
  • Hebb, A. K.
  • Partap, S.
Abstract

Porous natural-synthetic polymer composites were prepared using an alginate emulsion templating step followed by supercritical carbon dioxide (sc-CO 2) assisted impregnation (and subsequent polymerisation) of synthetic monomer mixtures. In the impregnation step, an initiator and either 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA), butylmethacrylate (BMA), ethyleneglycoldimethacrylate (EGDMA) or trimethylolpropanetrimethacrylate (TRIM) monomers, respectively, were used. After impregnation into the porous alginate foam, the synthetic monomer(s) were polymerised in situ, forming porous composites with increased stiffness. A number of methods were used to assess the effects of the impregnation/polymerisation process including uniaxial compression testing, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), helium pycnometry and Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy. Our results suggest that alginate foams impregnated with HEMA show higher weight gains and are stiffer than those impregnated with BMA. Such stiffer porous composites are potentially better suited than the unmodified materials in applications such as tissue engineering (cell-seeded) scaffolds, where mechanical conditioning is desired to stimulate cells for development of neo tissue growth. © Springer-Verlag 2007.

Topics
  • porous
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • composite
  • forming
  • porosimetry
  • Mercury