Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Praetorius, Antonia

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024A stochastic approach for parameter optimization of feature detection algorithms for non-target screening in mass spectrometry2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Seijo, Marianne
1 / 1 shared
Boudguiyer, Youssef
1 / 1 shared
Sadia, Mohammad
1 / 1 shared
Helmus, Rick
1 / 2 shared
Samanipour, Saer
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Seijo, Marianne
  • Boudguiyer, Youssef
  • Sadia, Mohammad
  • Helmus, Rick
  • Samanipour, Saer
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

A stochastic approach for parameter optimization of feature detection algorithms for non-target screening in mass spectrometry

  • Seijo, Marianne
  • Praetorius, Antonia
  • Boudguiyer, Youssef
  • Sadia, Mohammad
  • Helmus, Rick
  • Samanipour, Saer
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Feature detection plays a crucial role in non-target screening (NTS), requiring careful selection of algorithm parameters to minimize false positive (FP) features. In this study, a stochastic approach was employed to optimize the parameter settings of feature detection algorithms used in processing high-resolution mass spectrometry data. This approach was demonstrated using four open-source algorithms (OpenMS, SAFD, XCMS, and KPIC2) within the patRoon software platform for processing extracts from drinking water samples spiked with 46 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The designed method is based on a stochastic strategy involving random sampling from variable space and the use of Pearson correlation to assess the impact of each parameter on the number of detected suspect analytes. Using our approach, the optimized parameters led to improvement in the algorithm performance by increasing suspect hits in case of SAFD and XCMS, and reducing the total number of detected features (i.e., minimizing FP) for OpenMS. These improvements were further validated on three different drinking water samples as test dataset. The optimized parameters resulted in a lower false discovery rate (FDR%) compared to the default parameters, effectively increasing the detection of true positive features. This work also highlights the necessity of algorithm parameter optimization prior to starting the NTS to reduce the complexity of such datasets.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Graphical Abstract</jats:bold></jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • random
  • spectrometry
  • high-resolution mass spectrometry