Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Chan, Yuk Lun

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Enhancing the interfacial bonding strength between 3D-printed aluminium substrates and carbon fibre–reinforced polymers1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Bickerton, Simon
1 / 5 shared
Abdoli, Hamed
1 / 1 shared
Battley, Mark
1 / 4 shared
Diegel, Olaf
1 / 6 shared
Allen, Tom
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Bickerton, Simon
  • Abdoli, Hamed
  • Battley, Mark
  • Diegel, Olaf
  • Allen, Tom
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Enhancing the interfacial bonding strength between 3D-printed aluminium substrates and carbon fibre–reinforced polymers

  • Bickerton, Simon
  • Chan, Yuk Lun
  • Abdoli, Hamed
  • Battley, Mark
  • Diegel, Olaf
  • Allen, Tom
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract </jats:title><jats:p>Carbon fibre–reinforced polymers (CFRP) are increasingly utilised as materials within hybrid components in combination with plastics and metals. Although hybrid components provide a combination of advantages from the constituent materials, there are some challenges for the manufacture of high-quality hybrid components, including weak interface bonding between the constituent materials. This research focuses on utilising additive manufacturing (AM) technology to control an aluminium substrate's surface features to enhance interfacial bonding with a CFRP laminate. For this purpose, different surface structures were designed and manufactured using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) technology to understand the influence of surface geometry and roughness on the interface. A lattice structure with a unit cell size of 3 × 3 × 1.5 mm was manufactured to create a substrate surface with porosity. A second substrate surface was designed with the same lattice structure; however, the voids were filled to present an equivalent surface topology (EST), excluding porosity. This comparison provides an understanding of the influence of the porosity of the substrate surface on interfacial bonding strength. Interfacial bonding between the aluminium substrates and a CFRP laminate was assessed using short beam strength (SBS) and flatwise tensile tests. The results from the SBS testing indicated a 3D-printed substrate with random surface roughness increased the interlaminar shear strength of the hybrid component by almost 200% compared to a hybrid laminate with non-printed substrate. The results from flatwise tensile tests illustrated that the out-of-plane bonding strength can also be improved significantly (almost 100%).</jats:p>

Topics
  • surface
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • aluminium
  • strength
  • selective laser melting
  • random
  • void
  • porosity