Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cafagna, Damiana

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 6

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Comparative life cycle assessment of safety shoes toe caps manufacturing processes6citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Simoncini, Michela
1 / 13 shared
Castorani, Vincenzo
1 / 9 shared
Buccoliero, Giuseppe
1 / 8 shared
Forcellese, Archimede
1 / 15 shared
Bianchi, Iacopo
1 / 3 shared
Vita, Alessio
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Simoncini, Michela
  • Castorani, Vincenzo
  • Buccoliero, Giuseppe
  • Forcellese, Archimede
  • Bianchi, Iacopo
  • Vita, Alessio
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparative life cycle assessment of safety shoes toe caps manufacturing processes

  • Cafagna, Damiana
  • Simoncini, Michela
  • Castorani, Vincenzo
  • Buccoliero, Giuseppe
  • Forcellese, Archimede
  • Bianchi, Iacopo
  • Vita, Alessio
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Toe caps are fundamental components of safety footwear used to prevent injuries, which can be caused by falling objects. They can be realized by exploiting different materials (metal, composites, and polymers) and manufacturing processes (stamping, injection molding, compression molding, etc.). However, they have always to fulfill the stringent requirements of safety regulations. In addition, in order to guarantee ergonomic use, they must be as light as possible. It was estimated that at least 300 million pairs of safety footwear, with 600 million of toe caps, end up in landfill or are incinerated every year. This huge amount of wastes generates a high environmental impact, mainly attributable to toe caps manufacturing processes. In this context, it is important to develop new solutions aimed at minimizing the environmental impacts of toe caps manufacturing processes. Furthermore, the reuse of carbon fiber prepreg scraps has been recognized as a valid method to produce effective toe caps. In this paper, the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was exploited to perform a detailed analysis of the environmental impacts associated with toe caps obtained by reclaiming prepreg scraps. The results, in terms of cumulative energy demand, global warming potential, and ReCiPe endpoints, were compared to those obtained by LCA of toe caps in steel, aluminum alloy, polycarbonate, and glass fiber reinforced composite. The analysis demonstrated that toe caps in steel present the lowest environmental footprint but they are the heaviest ones. The reclaim process for carbon fiber prepreg scraps can be a valid alternative to produce sustainable and lightweight toe caps for safety footwear.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • aluminium
  • glass
  • glass
  • steel
  • composite
  • injection molding
  • compression molding