Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mccarthy, Michael John

  • Google
  • 15
  • 16
  • 180

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (15/15 displayed)

  • 2024Mechanical processing of wet stored fly ash for use as a cement component in concretecitations
  • 2022Impact of fly ash production and sourcing changes on chemical and physical aspects of concrete durability16citations
  • 2022Influence of wet storage on fly ash reactivity and processing for use in concrete3citations
  • 2021Potential of Weathered Blast Furnace Slag for use as an Addition in Concrete3citations
  • 2019Pozzolanas and pozzolanic materials103citations
  • 2017Evaluation of Fly Ash Reactivity Potential Using a Lime Consumption Test10citations
  • 2015Influence of Portland cement characteristics on air-entrainment in fly ash concrete6citations
  • 2013Evaluating Test Methods for Rapidly Assessing Fly Ash Reactivity for Use in Concretecitations
  • 2011Fly Ash Route to Low Embodied CO2 and Implications for Concrete Constructioncitations
  • 2010Mechanisms of sulfate heave prevention in lime stabilized clays through pozzolanic additions2citations
  • 2009Experiences of Processing Fly Ashes Recovered from United Kingdom Stockpiles and Lagoons, their Characteristics and Potential End Usescitations
  • 2007Utilising Class F Fly Ash to Offset Non-ideal Aggregate Characteristics for Concrete in Chloride Environmentscitations
  • 2004Comparative performance of chloride attenuating and corrosion inhibiting systems for reinforced concrete20citations
  • 2003Moving Fly Ash Utilisation in Concrete Forwardcitations
  • 2001Specifying concrete for chloride environments using controlled permeability formwork17citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hope, Thomas A.
1 / 1 shared
Csetényi, L. J.
8 / 24 shared
Yakub, Hamza I.
1 / 1 shared
Hope, Thomas
1 / 2 shared
Dyer, Thomas Daniel
2 / 14 shared
Strompinis, Nikolaos
2 / 2 shared
Yakub, Hamza
1 / 1 shared
Islam, G. M. Sadiqul
2 / 2 shared
Jones, Prof M. R.
8 / 29 shared
Newlands, Moray
1 / 13 shared
Sachdeva, Anisha
1 / 1 shared
Groppo, Jack
1 / 1 shared
Robl, Tom
1 / 1 shared
Zheng, Li
1 / 7 shared
Mccarthy, Aikaterini
2 / 4 shared
Giannakou, A.
2 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022
2021
2019
2017
2015
2013
2011
2010
2009
2007
2004
2003
2001

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hope, Thomas A.
  • Csetényi, L. J.
  • Yakub, Hamza I.
  • Hope, Thomas
  • Dyer, Thomas Daniel
  • Strompinis, Nikolaos
  • Yakub, Hamza
  • Islam, G. M. Sadiqul
  • Jones, Prof M. R.
  • Newlands, Moray
  • Sachdeva, Anisha
  • Groppo, Jack
  • Robl, Tom
  • Zheng, Li
  • Mccarthy, Aikaterini
  • Giannakou, A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparative performance of chloride attenuating and corrosion inhibiting systems for reinforced concrete

  • Giannakou, A.
  • Mccarthy, Michael John
  • Jones, Prof M. R.
Abstract

<p>This paper reports a laboratory-based study carried out to compare the performance of various proprietary concrete protection systems, designed to reduce chloride ingress and reinforcement corrosion. These include: controlled permeability formwork (CPF), a silane/siloxane hydrophobic surface treatment (S/S), an integral liquid waterproofing admixture (WP) and a corrosion-inhibiting chemical admixture (CI). Tests were carried out on a Portland cement (PC) concrete (40 N/mm<sup>2</sup> design strength) for chloride diffusion index (using a two-cell compartment accelerated test) and, under cyclic wetting and drying conditions, total chloride content at cover depth (25 mm) and corrosion of carbon steel in reinforced concrete specimens (using half-cell potential and corrosion current density (polarisation resistance) measurements). The results indicate that for all protection systems, resistance to chloride ingress was improved, with the greatest benefits noted for the S/S and CPF concretes. Corrosion levels occurring for these generally followed the ranking of chloride ingress rates. The CI was found to reduce the rate of chloride ingress and to give lowest corrosion current densities in relation to chloride contents. This system appeared to provide best overall performance. The practical implications of the results are considered in terms of equivalence of the systems to an increase in design strength or cover depth, i.e. parameters used for specifying concrete durability in standards, and the wider issues relating to their selection and use are reviewed.</p>

Topics
  • density
  • surface
  • Carbon
  • corrosion
  • strength
  • steel
  • cement
  • permeability
  • current density
  • durability
  • drying
  • chemical ionisation
  • chloride content