Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kılıç, Mahmut

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023The behavior of cold‐formed steel geopolimeric composites2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Çelebi, Oğuzhan
1 / 2 shared
Bayrak, Barış
1 / 2 shared
Aydin, Abdulkadir Cüneyt
1 / 2 shared
Alcan, Haluk Görkem
1 / 2 shared
Öz, Ali
1 / 2 shared
Kaplan, Gökhan
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Çelebi, Oğuzhan
  • Bayrak, Barış
  • Aydin, Abdulkadir Cüneyt
  • Alcan, Haluk Görkem
  • Öz, Ali
  • Kaplan, Gökhan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The behavior of cold‐formed steel geopolimeric composites

  • Çelebi, Oğuzhan
  • Bayrak, Barış
  • Aydin, Abdulkadir Cüneyt
  • Alcan, Haluk Görkem
  • Kılıç, Mahmut
  • Öz, Ali
  • Kaplan, Gökhan
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Geopolymer concrete‐filled cold formed steel composite beams can exhibit high durability and adequate strength. The geopolymer concrete is used to manufacture the cold‐formed steel tubular composite beam due to the significant advantages, such as greater in strength resisting capacity, higher‐energy dissipation capacity, and more stiffness than the regular one. This paper reports an experimental investigation on the behavior of rectangular geopolymer concrete‐filled cold‐formed steel composite beams. In order to investigate the mechanical behavior (such as flexural, shear, and torsion) of geopolymer concrete‐filled cold‐formed steel tubular composite beams (GCFTBs), 48 beam samples were tested. The 16‐GCFTBs and another 16‐GCFTBs were tested under flexural and overhanging, respectively, which the 16‐GCFTBs were tested under pure torsion. The relationships for load–displacement, torsional moment‐rotation angle, energy dissipation capacity, ductility, and failure mode were analyzed. The test results showed that the increase in cross‐sectional area and curing temperature had a significant effect on bending, shear and torsion behavior. Although the increase in the cross‐section ratio (height/width) increased the bending moment capacity, it decreased the displacement capacity and caused a decrease in ductility. Curing conditions and cross‐section ratio affected strength, displacement capacity, and experimental modulus of elasticity in both bending and shear tests. Increasing the cross‐section ratio and curing temperature resulted in an increase in ductility. Contrary to bending test and shear test, curing temperature, and cross‐section ratio increased both torsional moment strength and rotation angle in torsional moment tests.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • steel
  • shear test
  • composite
  • bending flexural test
  • elasticity
  • durability
  • ductility
  • curing