Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Valitova, Irina

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 12

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Carbon Electrodes for Perovskite Photovoltaics: Interfacial Properties, Meta‐Analysis, and Prospects12citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Clegg, Charlotte
1 / 1 shared
Jailani, Javith Mohammed
1 / 1 shared
March, Samuel
1 / 1 shared
Pecunia, Vincenzo
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Clegg, Charlotte
  • Jailani, Javith Mohammed
  • March, Samuel
  • Pecunia, Vincenzo
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Carbon Electrodes for Perovskite Photovoltaics: Interfacial Properties, Meta‐Analysis, and Prospects

  • Valitova, Irina
  • Clegg, Charlotte
  • Jailani, Javith Mohammed
  • March, Samuel
  • Pecunia, Vincenzo
Abstract

<jats:p>Carbon electrodes have gained significant attention as a cost‐effective, sustainable, stable, and scalable replacement for metal electrodes in perovskite solar cells (PSCs). However, traditional carbon‐electrode‐based PSCs (C‐PSCs) lack a hole‐selective layer (HSL) due to their incompatibility with the most effective organic HSLs employed in the PSC literature. In turn, the absence of an HSL has been identified as one of the main factors hindering the performance of C‐PSCs. Consequently, numerous studies have recognized the pivotal significance of the region between the perovskite absorber and the carbon electrode in C‐PSCs, proposing various interfacial engineering strategies to improve the performance of these solar cells. Given the rapid evolution of this field, an up‐to‐date and comprehensive review of C‐PSCs is in order. Key areas of focus of this review include the shift from high‐temperature to low‐temperature carbon electrodes, strategies to improve energetic alignment at the interface, novel approaches such as hole‐selective bilayers, and alternative carbon deposition methods to reduce solvent damage. Additionally, this review presents a comprehensive meta‐analysis—the first of its kind in the C‐PSC literature—to assess how various interfacial modifications impact critical C‐PSC performance metrics, offering valuable insights for future advancements in the field.</jats:p><jats:p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</jats:p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • perovskite
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • interfacial