People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Matteocci, Fabio
University of Rome Tor Vergata
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (19/19 displayed)
- 2024Breaking 1.7 V Open Circuit Voltage in Large Area Transparent Perovskite Solar Cells Using Interfaces Passivationcitations
- 2024Physical and chemical properties and degradation of MAPbBr3 films on transparent substrates
- 2024Breaking 1.7 V Open Circuit Voltage in Large Area Transparent Perovskite Solar Cells Using Interfaces Passivationcitations
- 2024Effect of Chlorine Inclusion in Wide Band Gap FAPbBr3 Perovskitescitations
- 2024Effect of Chlorine Inclusion in Wide Band Gap FAPbBr 3 Perovskitescitations
- 2023Degradation and Self-Healing of FAPbBr3 Perovskite under Soft-X-Ray Irradiationcitations
- 2023Semitransparent perovskite solar cells with ultrathin protective buffer layerscitations
- 2023Matching the photocurrent of 2‐terminal mechanically‐stacked perovskite/organic tandem solar modules by varying the cell widthcitations
- 2023Degradation and Self‐Healing of FAPbBr 3 Perovskite under Soft‐X‐Ray Irradiationcitations
- 2023Breaking 1.7V open circuit voltage in large area transparent perovskite solar cells using bulk and interfaces passivation.citations
- 2022Wide bandgap halide perovskite absorbers for semi-transparent photovoltaics: From theoretical design to modulescitations
- 2022Sodium Diffuses from Glass Substrates through P1 Lines and Passivates Defects in Perovskite Solar Modules
- 2021Roadmap on organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite semiconductors and devicescitations
- 2020Ion Migration‐Induced Amorphization and Phase Segregation as a Degradation Mechanism in Planar Perovskite Solar Cells
- 2019Nano-structured TiO2 grown by low-temperature reactive sputtering for planar perovskite solar cellscitations
- 2018Perovskite-Polymer Blends Influencing Microstructures, Nonradiative Recombination Pathways, and Photovoltaic Performance of Perovskite Solar Cellscitations
- 2016Device architectures with nanocrystalline mesoporous scaffolds and thin compact layers for flexible perovskite solar cells and modules
- 2015Interface and Composition Analysis on Perovskite Solar Cells.
- 2015Interface and Composition Analysis on Perovskite Solar Cellscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Matching the photocurrent of 2‐terminal mechanically‐stacked perovskite/organic tandem solar modules by varying the cell width
Abstract
<jats:p>Photocurrent matching in conventional monolithic tandem solar cells is achieved by choosing semiconductors with complementary absorption spectra and by carefully adjusting the optical properties of the complete top and bottom stacks. However, for thin film photovoltaic technologies at the module level, another design variable significantly alleviates the task of photocurrent matching, namely the cell width, whose modification can be readily realized by the adjustment of the module layout. Herein we demonstrate this concept at the experimental level for the first time for a 2T‐mechanically stacked perovskite (FAPbBr<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>)/organic (PM6:Y6:PCBM) tandem mini‐module, an unprecedented approach for these emergent photovoltaic technologies fabricated in an independent manner. An excellent <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sub> <jats:italic>sc</jats:italic> </jats:sub> matching is achieved by tuning the cell widths of the perovskite and organic modules to 7.22 mm (<jats:italic>PCE</jats:italic><jats:sub> <jats:italic>PVKT‐mod</jats:italic> </jats:sub>= 6.69%) and 3.19 mm (<jats:italic>PCE</jats:italic><jats:sub> <jats:italic>OPV‐mod</jats:italic> </jats:sub>= 12.46%), respectively, leading to a champion efficiency of 14.94% for the tandem module interconnected in series with an aperture area of 20.25 cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>. Rather than demonstrating high efficiencies at the level of small lab cells, our successful experimental proof‐of‐concept at the module level proves to be particularly useful to couple devices with non‐complementary semiconductors, either in series or in parallel electrical connection, hence overcoming the limitations imposed by the monolithic structure.</jats:p><jats:p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</jats:p>