Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mkaouar, Sameh

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Corrosion Evaluation of Copper with Polystyrene‐Block‐Poly(ethylene‐ran‐butylene)‐Block‐Polystyrene Triblock (SEBS) Copolymer Coating in 3 % NaCl Solution by Using Response Surface Methodology2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Masmoudi, Fatma
1 / 1 shared
Masmoudi, Mohamed
1 / 2 shared
Amor, Yasser Ben
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Masmoudi, Fatma
  • Masmoudi, Mohamed
  • Amor, Yasser Ben
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Corrosion Evaluation of Copper with Polystyrene‐Block‐Poly(ethylene‐ran‐butylene)‐Block‐Polystyrene Triblock (SEBS) Copolymer Coating in 3 % NaCl Solution by Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Mkaouar, Sameh
  • Masmoudi, Fatma
  • Masmoudi, Mohamed
  • Amor, Yasser Ben
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The present research work undertakes the investigation of preparation of the polystyrene‐block‐poly (ethylene‐ran‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene triblock (SEBS) copolymer coating on a copper surface (Cu‐SEBS) following a well‐defined immersion protocol. The SEBS ratio, drying temperature (Temp), and drying time (time) are the factors for the determination of the immersion protocol of the Cu‐SEBS electrode's preparation. To evaluate the effects of these factors on the anticorrosive behaviour of copper in NaCl 3 % solution and to determine the best conditions to produce a protective SEBS film on the copper surface (low corrosion rate), we used the experimental design and the central composite design (CCD). The response surface methodology (RSM) was used in this study as an optimization method and the Statgraphics software was used to treat experimental design data. The corrosion rate of Cu‐SEBS at the different runs of the experimental matrix was measured by voltammetry around the open circuit potential (OCP) (ΔE=±50 mV vs SCE). The analysis of variance, the Pareto graph and the figure of the main and combined effect of the experimental factors show that the SEBS rate is the most significant factor. The linear effect of time and Temp, the quadratic effect of SEBS ratio, and the interaction between SEBS ratio and the drying temperature is, even though important, less significant. The optimized parameters were determined to obtain the lower corrosion rate, which was a 3.059 % of SEBS ratio, 70.18 °C of drying temperature, and 21 min of drying time. Then, to confirm the model, an electrochemical investigation of SEBS‐coated copper at optimal conditions of immersion protocol (Cu‐SEBS‐Opt‐Cond) was successfully applied in a 3 wt % NaCl aqueous solution. The corrosion rate of Cu‐SEBS‐Opt‐Cond was obtained by voltammetry around the open circuit potential (OCP) equal 0.00023 mm year<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> which is close to that found by the experimental design. The measures of voltammetry around OCP, cyclic voltammetric (CV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) showed that the Cu‐SEBS‐Opt‐Cond electrode exhibited more stability and a much higher corrosion resistance than that observed for bare copper.</jats:p>

Topics
  • surface
  • corrosion
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • composite
  • copper
  • electrochemical-induced impedance spectroscopy
  • copolymer
  • drying
  • voltammetry