| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Palonen, Heikki
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (5/5 displayed)
- 2022Optimized BaZrO3 nanorod density in YBa2Cu3O6+x matrix for high field applicationscitations
- 2021Mono- and Bimetallic Ni−Co Catalysts in Dry Reforming of Methanecitations
- 2021Mono‐ and Bimetallic Ni−Co Catalysts in Dry Reforming of Methanecitations
- 2021Detection of X‐Ray Doses with Color‐Changing Hackmanites: Mechanism and Applicationcitations
- 2017Concentration dependence of hydrogen diffusion in clamped vanadium (001) filmscitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Mono‐ and Bimetallic Ni−Co Catalysts in Dry Reforming of Methane
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Several bimetallic Ni−Co catalysts supported on θ‐Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> together with 10 wt % Ni and 10 wt % Co on θ‐Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> were prepared via the incipient wetness method, characterized by X‐ray diffraction (XRD), nitrogen adsorption, transmission electron microscopy, temperature programmed reduction, temperature programmed CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> desorption, Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) with pyridine adsorption‐desorption and tested in dry methane reforming at 700 °C in a fixed bed reactor. According to XRD the metal oxide crystallite sizes decreased from 20 nm for 10 wt % Co/θ‐Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> to 13 nm for 5 wt % Ni‐5 wt % Co/θ‐Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>, which also showed formation of a mixed oxide alloy. The unit cell parameters for spinel in the fresh catalyst and fcc metal formed during the reaction followed the Vegard's rule. Although monometallic 10 wt % Co/θ‐Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> exhibited high hydrogen consumption, desorption temperature was also high resulting in a rather low activity of 10 wt % Co/θ‐Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> in comparison to bimetallic 5 wt % Ni‐5 wt % Co/θ‐Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>. The latter exhibited the highest initial activity for hydrogen formation due to its relatively small metal particle size. This catalyst suffered, however, from extensive coking. The most stable catalyst was 10 wt % Ni/θ‐Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> for which the hydrogen yield decreased form 56 % to 45 % during 100 h time‐on‐stream. For this catalyst no sintering occurred, opposite to 10 wt % Co/θ‐Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>.</jats:p>