People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Torrescano-Alvarez, J. M.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (4/4 displayed)
- 2019Incorporation of alloying elements into porous anodic films on aluminium alloys: the role of cell diametercitations
- 2018Effects of oxygen evolution on the voltage and film morphology during galvanostatic anodizing of AA 2024-T3 aluminium alloy in sulphuric acid at -2 and 24 °C.citations
- 2018Effect of anodizing conditions on the cell morphology of anodic films on AA2024-T3 alloycitations
- 2017Gravimetric measurement of oxygen evolution during anodizing of aluminium alloyscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Effect of anodizing conditions on the cell morphology of anodic films on AA2024-T3 alloy
Abstract
The effects of applied current density, anodizing time, and electrolyte temperature on the cell and pore morphology of anodic films and the voltage-time response obtained during galvanostatic anodizing of AA2024-T3 alloy in sulphuric acid electrolytes have been studied. Scanning electron microscopy was employed to observe the film morphology. Sponge-like porous structure was promoted by anodizing at relatively low current density and high electrolyte temperature. In contrast, linear porous structure was favoured under the converse conditions. Intermediate conditions resulted in films containing either sequential layers of the 2 morphologies or a morphology incorporating features of the 2 types; such conditions were associated with anodizing voltages in the range 25 to 35 V. The reasons for the morphological differences are proposed to be due to interactions between film growth stresses and stresses arising from oxygen evolution on the development of the alumina cells.