Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Azdast, Taher

  • Google
  • 3
  • 7
  • 25

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2024An experimental and numerical study on an innovative metastructure for 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane with auxetic performance5citations
  • 2024Process‐property relationship in polylactic acid composites reinforced by iron microparticles and <scp>3D</scp> printed by fused filament fabrication17citations
  • 2024Determination of electromagnetic traveling path in polymer/multi‐walled carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams and analysis by Taguchi technique3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mojaver, Mehran
1 / 1 shared
Hasanzadeh, Rezgar
3 / 4 shared
Moradi, Mahmoud
1 / 83 shared
Bodaghi, Mahdi
1 / 46 shared
Mihankhah, Peyman
1 / 1 shared
Azerang, Bashar
1 / 1 shared
Doniavi, Ali
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mojaver, Mehran
  • Hasanzadeh, Rezgar
  • Moradi, Mahmoud
  • Bodaghi, Mahdi
  • Mihankhah, Peyman
  • Azerang, Bashar
  • Doniavi, Ali
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Process‐property relationship in polylactic acid composites reinforced by iron microparticles and <scp>3D</scp> printed by fused filament fabrication

  • Moradi, Mahmoud
  • Azdast, Taher
  • Bodaghi, Mahdi
  • Hasanzadeh, Rezgar
  • Mihankhah, Peyman
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p>Polylactic acid (PLA) is the most widely used material in the fused filament fabrication (FFF) technique, which is a biocompatible thermoplastic. However, PLA's usefulness is limited by its narrow processing window and relatively low mechanical properties. Therefore, PLA composites have been developed to enhance its properties for FFF printing. A key challenge in producing composite parts via this method is to find the correlation between the mechanical properties of the parts and the process parameters. This knowledge is essential for optimizing the printing process to achieve the desired mechanical properties for composite parts industries such as aerospace, automotive, and medical, where high‐performance composite materials are crucial. The ability to control and predict the mechanical properties of FFF‐printed composite parts is critical for their successful integration into these industries. In this study, the effect of nozzle temperature (NT), printing speed (PS), and nominal porosity (POR) on the impact strength and specific impact strength of PLA/iron composites was examined using FFF. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the experimental design. The results revealed that POR had the most significant effect on the impact resistance data, while NT had the least effect. Reducing the POR led to improved impact resistance in the samples. Multi‐objective optimization results showed that the lowest NT (190°C), the lowest POR (30%), and a PS of 50 mm/s were the optimal conditions for multiple objectives. RSM was also utilized to develop mathematical models of impact properties, focusing on varying NT, POR, and PS, which can be used to predict desired impact properties.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Highlights</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Nominal porosity has the most influence on the impact strength of PLA/iron composites.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Optimum values were temperature of 190°C, nominal porosity of 30%, and speed of 50 mm/s.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>RSM was effective in enhancing the mechanical properties of composite materials.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>RSM models provide a predictive tool for future FFF‐printed composite parts.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Maximum impact strength of 4.44 kJ/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> was achieved.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • composite
  • iron
  • porosity
  • thermoplastic
  • size-exclusion chromatography
  • field-flow fractionation