Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cripps, Robert

  • Google
  • 4
  • 5
  • 18

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2023An analysis of rotationally moulded sandwich structure’s repeated impact propertiescitations
  • 2019An investigation of low velocity impact properties of rotationally molded skin–foam–skin sandwich structure4citations
  • 2018Fracture toughness of rotationally molded polyethylene and polypropylene14citations
  • 2016Impact properties analysis of rotationally molded polyethylene and polypropylene for a wide range of temperaturescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wang, Lei
3 / 23 shared
Saifullah, Abu Naser Muhammad
4 / 22 shared
Thomas, Ben
4 / 6 shared
Tabeshfar, Kamran
4 / 5 shared
Muryn, Christopher
1 / 16 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2019
2018
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wang, Lei
  • Saifullah, Abu Naser Muhammad
  • Thomas, Ben
  • Tabeshfar, Kamran
  • Muryn, Christopher
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Fracture toughness of rotationally molded polyethylene and polypropylene

  • Wang, Lei
  • Saifullah, Abu Naser Muhammad
  • Cripps, Robert
  • Thomas, Ben
  • Tabeshfar, Kamran
  • Muryn, Christopher
Abstract

In this work, the fracture toughness of rotationally molded polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) was measured using J integral methods at static loading rates and at room temperature. Two different commercially available rotational molding grades PE and PP were tested in this study which have been used in various rotationally molded products such as small leisure craft, water storage tanks, and so on. Scanning electron microscope (SEM), optical microscope, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance (solid‐state NMR), and X‐ray scattering were used to investigate the microstructure, fracture surfaces, and compare toughness properties of these materials. In PE, higher molecular weight and broader molecular weight distribution, larger amorphous and crystal region thicknesses are found to be related to higher toughness values. High molecular weight favors higher number of entanglements that improve fracture energy and broader distribution increases long chain branching of higher molecular weight fractions which creates higher entanglements at the branch sites. Larger amorphous regions promote microvoiding more easily compared to thinner amorphous regions, leading to greater plastic deformation and energy absorption. Higher crystal thickness also contributes to microvoiding in the amorphous region. For PP, greater plastic deformation observed in the fracture surfaces is related to higher fracture toughness values.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • polymer
  • amorphous
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • differential scanning calorimetry
  • molecular weight
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy
  • fracture toughness
  • rotational molding