Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Weng, Panpan

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 5

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Interfacial properties of carbon fiber‐reinforced biobased resin composites by single fiber fragmentation, fiber push‐out, and interlaminar shear strength5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Murphy, Neal
1 / 19 shared
Odowd, Noel
1 / 3 shared
Rao, Pavan S.
1 / 1 shared
Prasad, Vishnu
1 / 2 shared
Scarselli, Gennaro
1 / 13 shared
Ivankovic, Alojz
1 / 10 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Murphy, Neal
  • Odowd, Noel
  • Rao, Pavan S.
  • Prasad, Vishnu
  • Scarselli, Gennaro
  • Ivankovic, Alojz
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Interfacial properties of carbon fiber‐reinforced biobased resin composites by single fiber fragmentation, fiber push‐out, and interlaminar shear strength

  • Murphy, Neal
  • Odowd, Noel
  • Rao, Pavan S.
  • Prasad, Vishnu
  • Scarselli, Gennaro
  • Ivankovic, Alojz
  • Weng, Panpan
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p>The present study examines the interfacial properties of carbon fiber biobased resin composites by comparing the test methods such as the single fiber fragmentation test, fiber push‐out test, and interlaminar shear strength test. The composites were fabricated using a cold vacuum‐assisted resin infusion method for the preparation of fiber push‐out and interlaminar shear test specimens. The interfacial adhesion from the three different test methods is analyzed and compared to determine their relative effectiveness in evaluating interfacial adhesion. Plasma treatment is performed on the carbon fibers and the interfacial shear stress is evaluated by conducting the push‐out test. The surface characterization of the carbon fibers is done by scanning electron microscopy and x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy to investigate the influence of the plasma treatment on the fiber surface. Plasma treatment resulted in significant improvement in the interfacial adhesion between the fiber and matrix.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Highlights</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Analysis and comparison of interfacial adhesion by several test methods.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Single fiber fragmentation and push‐out tests with IFSS of 40.5 and 42.2 MPa.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Plasma surface treatment improved the IFSS by 88.1%.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Surface characterization of treated and untreated fibers by SEM and XPS.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • Carbon
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
  • strength
  • shear test
  • composite
  • resin
  • size-exclusion chromatography