| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Murphy, Neal
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (19/19 displayed)
- 2023Interfacial properties of carbon fiber‐reinforced biobased resin composites by single fiber fragmentation, fiber push‐out, and interlaminar shear strengthcitations
- 2021Fatigue delamination behaviour of carbon fibre/epoxy composites interleaved with thermoplastic veilscitations
- 2020Enhancing the fracture toughness of carbon fibre/epoxy composites by interleaving hybrid meltable/non-meltable thermoplastic veilscitations
- 2020Mode-II fracture behaviour of aerospace-grade carbon fibre/epoxy composites interleaved with thermoplastic veilscitations
- 2020Significantly enhanced structural integrity of adhesively bonded PPS and PEEK composite joints by rapidly UV-irradiating the substratescitations
- 2020Effect of interlaying UV-irradiated PEEK fibres on the mechanical, impact and fracture response of aerospace-grade carbon fibre/epoxy compositescitations
- 2020The influence of interlayer/epoxy adhesion on the mode-I and mode-II fracture response of carbon fibre/epoxy composites interleaved with thermoplastic veilscitations
- 2014Impact fatigue fracture of polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) cutters and the effect of microstructurecitations
- 2014Impact fatigue fracture of polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) cutters and the effect of microstructurecitations
- 2013Influence of an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Surface Treatment on the Interfacial Fracture Toughness on Bonded Composite Joints
- 2013Arbitrary crack propagation in multi-phase materials using the finite volume methodcitations
- 2013Characterisation of the fracture energy and toughening mechanisms of a nano-toughened epoxy adhesivecitations
- 2013Dynamic crack bifurcation in PMMAcitations
- 2013Effect of prepreg storage humidity on the mixed-mode fracture toughness of a co-cured composite jointcitations
- 2013An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Mixed-mode Fracture Toughness and Lap Shear Strength of Aerospace Grade Composite Joints
- 2013The mechanical properties of polycrystalline diamond as a function of strain rate and temperaturecitations
- 2013High rate and high temperature fracture behaviour of polycrystalline diamondcitations
- 2013Micro-Mechanical Modelling of Void Growth, Damage and Fracture of Nano-Phase Structural Adhesives Using the Finite Volume Method
- 2013The prediction of dynamic fracture evolution in PMMA using a cohesive zone modelcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Interfacial properties of carbon fiber‐reinforced biobased resin composites by single fiber fragmentation, fiber push‐out, and interlaminar shear strength
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p>The present study examines the interfacial properties of carbon fiber biobased resin composites by comparing the test methods such as the single fiber fragmentation test, fiber push‐out test, and interlaminar shear strength test. The composites were fabricated using a cold vacuum‐assisted resin infusion method for the preparation of fiber push‐out and interlaminar shear test specimens. The interfacial adhesion from the three different test methods is analyzed and compared to determine their relative effectiveness in evaluating interfacial adhesion. Plasma treatment is performed on the carbon fibers and the interfacial shear stress is evaluated by conducting the push‐out test. The surface characterization of the carbon fibers is done by scanning electron microscopy and x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy to investigate the influence of the plasma treatment on the fiber surface. Plasma treatment resulted in significant improvement in the interfacial adhesion between the fiber and matrix.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Highlights</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Analysis and comparison of interfacial adhesion by several test methods.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Single fiber fragmentation and push‐out tests with IFSS of 40.5 and 42.2 MPa.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Plasma surface treatment improved the IFSS by 88.1%.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Surface characterization of treated and untreated fibers by SEM and XPS.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p></jats:sec>