Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Basu, Soumen

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 11

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Enhancing the mechanical performance of <scp>E</scp>‐glass fiber epoxy composites using coal‐derived graphene oxide11citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mahajan, Roop L.
1 / 1 shared
Garg, Anushka
1 / 1 shared
Mehta, Rajeev
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mahajan, Roop L.
  • Garg, Anushka
  • Mehta, Rajeev
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Enhancing the mechanical performance of <scp>E</scp>‐glass fiber epoxy composites using coal‐derived graphene oxide

  • Mahajan, Roop L.
  • Basu, Soumen
  • Garg, Anushka
  • Mehta, Rajeev
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p>In this study, we compare the effect of various precursor‐based graphene oxide (GO) nanofillers on enhancing the mechanical performance of E‐glass fiber‐reinforced epoxy resin composites (EGFPs). GO derived from bituminous coal (BC‐GO) and graphite (Gr‐GO) were dispersed into an epoxy resin matrix. The resulting mixture was combined with E‐glass fiber mats using vacuum‐assisted resin infusion molding. Notable improvements (38.9% in flexural strength, 22.9% in tensile strength, and 21.6% in impact strength) were observed in BC‐GO‐reinforced EGFPs at 0.25 phr loading of BC‐GO. The improvements for Gr‐GO‐reinforced EGFPs were 28%, 9.3%, and 6.8%, respectively. XRD analysis of BC‐GO showed a diffraction peak at 2<jats:italic>θ</jats:italic> = 20.9°. Except for this peak, no other crystalline peaks were observed when BC‐GO was incorporated into EGFPs. FTIR spectra of both composite samples, with or without the nanofiller, were similar due to the spectral peaks overlap. TEM demonstrated the exfoliated morphology of BC‐GO in EGFPs. These findings underscore the potential of BC‐GO as a cost‐effective reinforcement for polymer nanocomposites across various industrial applications, including the development of lightweight and strong materials for aerospace and automotive industries, protective coatings, petroleum, and aerospace production systems.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Highlights</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>BC‐GO demonstrates superior mechanical performance compared to Gr‐GO in EGFPs.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>0.25 phr BC‐GO improves 38.9% flexural, 22.9% tensile, and 21.6% impact strengths.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Beyond 0.25 phr, BC‐GO and Gr‐GO showed a decline in mechanical enhancement.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Role of particle size, loading &amp; adhesion to matrix analyzed using XRD, FTIR, and DLS.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Coal‐GO is an attractive alternative nanofiller for EGFPs.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • nanocomposite
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • x-ray diffraction
  • glass
  • glass
  • strength
  • flexural strength
  • transmission electron microscopy
  • tensile strength
  • resin
  • size-exclusion chromatography
  • dynamic light scattering