| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Dröder, Klaus
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (24/24 displayed)
- 2024Investigation of Recycled Expanded Polyamide Beads through Artificial Ageing and Mechanical Recycling as a Proof of Concept for Circular Economycitations
- 2023In-Process Integration of Reinforcement for Construction Elements During Shotcrete 3D Printing
- 2023Development of thin-film sensors for in-process measurement during injection moldingcitations
- 2023Investigations for Material Tracing in Selective Laser Sintering: Part ΙΙ: Validation of Modified Polymers as Marking Agentscitations
- 2023Investigations for Material Tracing in Selective Laser Sintering: Part ΙΙ: Validation of Modified Polymers as Marking Agentscitations
- 2023Investigations for Material Tracing in Selective Laser Sintering: Part Ι: Methodical Selection of a Suitable Marking Agentcitations
- 2023Investigations for Material Tracing in Selective Laser Sintering: Part Ι: Methodical Selection of a Suitable Marking Agentcitations
- 2023A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills
- 2023Enclosing Reinforcement Structures in Shotcrete 3D Printing
- 2023Comparison of modelling approaches for the bending behaviour of fibre‐reinforced thermoplastics in finite element forming analysescitations
- 2023Design and Analysis of Mechanical Gripper Technologies for Handling Mesh Electrodes in Electrolysis Cell Production
- 2021Combined robot-based manufacturing and machining of multi-material componentscitations
- 2021Simulation-based digital twin for the manufacturing of thermoplastic composites
- 2021Numerical Modelling of Bond Strength in Overmoulded Thermoplastic Composites
- 2021Finite Element and Finite Volume Modelling of Friction Drilling HSLA Steel under Experimental Comparison
- 2021Machine learning and simulation-based surrogate modeling for improved process chain operationcitations
- 2020A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end millscitations
- 2020Integrated computational product and production engineering for multi-material lightweight structurescitations
- 2019Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Thermoplastics in Multi-Axis Forming Processes
- 2019Computational Manufacturing for Multi-Material Lightweight Parts
- 2018Multiscale Simulation of Short Fiber Reinforced Plastics for Hybrid Composites
- 2017Introduction of an in-mould infrared heating device for processing thermoplastic fibre-reinforced preforms and manufacturing hybrid components
- 2015Honing with polymer based cutting fluidscitations
- 2015Novel form-flexible handling and joining tool for automated preforming
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Comparison of modelling approaches for the bending behaviour of fibre‐reinforced thermoplastics in finite element forming analyses
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the forming of thermoplastic composite laminates, the temperature‐dependent bending behaviour plays a significant role, in addition to in‐plane tension, in‐plane shear and ply/ply as well as tool/ply friction. The bending properties are decoupled from the in‐plane properties. Classical beam theories are therefore not valid for laminates, as they significantly overestimate the bending stiffness, especially in the molten state. Various approaches to modelling the bending behaviour have been presented in the literature, which can be used to model the out‐of‐plane properties for simulation. With these approaches, a parameter optimisation based on experimental deflection curves is performed through cantilever beam tests. A comparative analysis is then carried out to evaluate the suitability of a temperature and direction dependent modelling of the bending behaviour, the influence of the in‐plane properties and the computation time.</jats:p>