Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kotys, M. S.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 44

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2009Magnetic resonance elastography in the liver at 3 Tesla using a second harmonic approach44citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Pettigrew, R. I.
1 / 1 shared
Sinkus, Ralph
1 / 15 shared
Gharib, A. M.
1 / 1 shared
Herzka, D. A.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2009

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Pettigrew, R. I.
  • Sinkus, Ralph
  • Gharib, A. M.
  • Herzka, D. A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Magnetic resonance elastography in the liver at 3 Tesla using a second harmonic approach

  • Pettigrew, R. I.
  • Sinkus, Ralph
  • Gharib, A. M.
  • Herzka, D. A.
  • Kotys, M. S.
Abstract

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) using mechanical stimulation has demonstrated diagnostic value and clinical promise in breast, liver, and kidney at 1.5 Tesla (T). However, MRE at 1.5T suffers from long imaging times and would benefit from greater signal-to-noise for more robust postprocessing. We present an MRE sequence modified for liver imaging at 3.0T. To avoid artifacts in the phase images, the sequence maintains a short TE by using a second harmonic approach, including stronger motion encoding gradients, shorter radio frequency pulses and an echo-planar readout. Scan time was decreased by a factor of approximately 2 relative to 1.5T by using an EPI readout and a higher density sampling of the phase waveform was used to calculate shear stiffness and viscosity. Localized (small region of interest) and global (whole-liver region of interest) measurements in normal healthy subjects compared very favorably with previously published results at 1.5T. There was no significant difference between global and localized measures.

Topics
  • density
  • phase
  • viscosity