People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Salta, Maria
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (9/9 displayed)
- 2023Development of a model system to investigate the effects of surface roughness and media on marine biofilm formation and microbiologically influenced corrosion
- 2022EUROCORR: Effects of surface roughness on anaerobic marine biofilm formation and microbiologically-influenced corrosion of UNS G10180 carbon steel
- 2022The effects of surface roughness on anaerobic marine biofilm formation and microbiologically-influenced corrosion of UNS G10180 carbon steel
- 2022RMF: Microbiologically-influenced corrosion (MIC): Development of a model system to investigate the role of biofilm communities within MIC and their control using industrial biocides
- 2022MSC: Effects of surface roughness on anaerobic marine biofilm formation and microbiologically influenced corrosion of UNS G10180 carbon steel
- 2021Microbiologically-influenced corrosion (MIC): Development of a model system to investigate the role of biofilm communities within MIC and their control using industrial biocides
- 2021Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundancecitations
- 2014Biomimetic strategies in antifouling coatings
- 2012A novel microfluidic approach for the assessment of antifouling technologies
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance
Abstract
Marine biofouling imposes serious environmental and economic impacts on marine applications, especially in the shipping industry. To combat biofouling, protective coatings are applied on vessel hulls which are divided into two major groups: biocidal and non-toxic fouling release. The current study aimed to explore the effect of coating type on microbial biofilm community profiles to better understand the differences between the communities developed on fouling control biocidal antifouling and biocidal-free coatings. Biocidal (Intersmooth® 7460HS SPC), fouling release (Intersleek® 900), and inert surfaces were deployed in the marine environment for 4 months, and the biofilms that developed on these surfaces were investigated using Illumina NGS sequencing, targeting the prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene. The results confirmed differences in the community profiles between coating types. The biocidal coating supported communities dominated by Alphaproteobacteria (<i>Loktanella, Sphingorhabdus, Erythrobacter</i>) and Bacteroidetes (<i>Gilvibacter</i>), while other taxa, such as <i>Portibacter </i>and Sva0996 marine group, proliferated on the fouling-release surface. Knowledge of these marine biofilm components on fouling control coatings will serve as a guide for future investigations of marine microfouling as well as informing the coatings industry of potential microbial targets for robust coating formulations.