Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mengal, A. N.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 5

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017In–plane shear properties of basalt–carbon/epoxy hybrid composite laminates5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ovinis, Mark
1 / 9 shared
Karuppanan, S.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ovinis, Mark
  • Karuppanan, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

In–plane shear properties of basalt–carbon/epoxy hybrid composite laminates

  • Ovinis, Mark
  • Mengal, A. N.
  • Karuppanan, S.
Abstract

<p>In this work, the in-plane shear properties of basalt-carbon/epoxy hybrid composite laminates is investigated. The composite laminates were fabricated using the hand layup method. Six symmetrical lamination stacking sequences ([0<sub>2</sub>C/±45B/0B]<sub>S,</sub> [0<sub>2</sub>C/0B/±45B]<sub>S,</sub> [0<sub>2</sub>C/±45<sub>2</sub>B]<sub>S,</sub> [0B/±45B/0<sub>2</sub>C]<sub>S,</sub> [±45B/0B/0<sub>2</sub>C]<sub>S,</sub> [±45<sub>2</sub>B/0<sub>2</sub>C]<sub>S</sub>) with eight layers of unidirectional 0 ° and biaxial ±45 ° were selected for the current study. One eight-layered unidirectional 0<sup>o</sup> fiber layup of pure carbon fiber and one eight-layered unidirectional 0<sup>o</sup> fiber layup of pure basalt fiber were used as a reference. The in-plane shear strength of the composite laminates were determined experimentally according to the ASTM D7078 standard. The hybridization of basalt fiber and carbon fiber showed significant improvement in the in-plane shear strength and modulus of rigidity. The failure of the composite laminates was examined using the ASTM D7078 standard failure codes. Hybrid composite laminates C2 and B2, i. e. for [0<sub>2</sub>C/±45B/0B]<sub>S</sub> and [0B/±45B/0<sub>2</sub>C]<sub>S</sub>, respectively had the highest in-plane shear strength while pure carbon C1 and pure basalt B1 with [0<sub>8</sub>C] and [0<sub>8</sub>B], respectively had the lowest shear strength.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • strength
  • layered
  • composite