Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Francis, Paul S.

  • Google
  • 6
  • 31
  • 175

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2023Using Nitroxides to Enhance Carbon Fiber Interfacial Adhesion and as an Anchor for “Graft to” Surface Modification Strategies1citations
  • 2023Flexible carbon fiber based structural supercapacitor composites with solvate ionic liquid-epoxy solid electrolyte38citations
  • 2022Carbon reinforced carbon fibers24citations
  • 2022Multifunctional polymeric surface coatings of carbon fibre electrodes for enhanced energy storage performance12citations
  • 2021Improving the effects of plasma polymerization on carbon fiber using a surface modification pretreatment47citations
  • 2019Fiber with Butterfly Wings: Creating Colored Carbon Fibers with Increased Strength, Adhesion, and Reversible Malleability53citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Blinco, James P.
1 / 1 shared
Fairfullsmith, Kathryn E.
1 / 1 shared
Hendlmeier, Andreas
2 / 6 shared
Adcock, Jacqui L.
1 / 1 shared
He, Siyuan
1 / 1 shared
Walsh, Tiffany R.
1 / 3 shared
Henderson, Luke
2 / 11 shared
Vuković, Filip
1 / 2 shared
Eyckens, Daniel J.
3 / 12 shared
Harris, Jessica
1 / 2 shared
Dharmasiri, Bhagya
3 / 4 shared
Stojcevski, Filip
3 / 11 shared
Henderson, Luke C.
4 / 15 shared
Borkar, Ameya
1 / 1 shared
Doeven, Egan H.
3 / 4 shared
Connell, Timothy U.
1 / 2 shared
Razal, Joselito M.
2 / 8 shared
Qin, Si Alex
2 / 2 shared
Usman, Ken Aldren S.
2 / 2 shared
Randall, James
1 / 1 shared
Stanfield, Melissa K.
2 / 4 shared
Randall, James D.
2 / 10 shared
Soulsby, Lachlan C.
2 / 2 shared
Jarvis, Karyn
1 / 1 shared
Wickramasingha, Y. Athulya
1 / 4 shared
Barlow, Anders J.
1 / 3 shared
Alexander, Richard
1 / 2 shared
Pinson, Jean
1 / 6 shared
Gengenbach, Thomas
1 / 15 shared
Arnold, Chantelle
1 / 2 shared
Eyckens, Daniel
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Blinco, James P.
  • Fairfullsmith, Kathryn E.
  • Hendlmeier, Andreas
  • Adcock, Jacqui L.
  • He, Siyuan
  • Walsh, Tiffany R.
  • Henderson, Luke
  • Vuković, Filip
  • Eyckens, Daniel J.
  • Harris, Jessica
  • Dharmasiri, Bhagya
  • Stojcevski, Filip
  • Henderson, Luke C.
  • Borkar, Ameya
  • Doeven, Egan H.
  • Connell, Timothy U.
  • Razal, Joselito M.
  • Qin, Si Alex
  • Usman, Ken Aldren S.
  • Randall, James
  • Stanfield, Melissa K.
  • Randall, James D.
  • Soulsby, Lachlan C.
  • Jarvis, Karyn
  • Wickramasingha, Y. Athulya
  • Barlow, Anders J.
  • Alexander, Richard
  • Pinson, Jean
  • Gengenbach, Thomas
  • Arnold, Chantelle
  • Eyckens, Daniel
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Using Nitroxides to Enhance Carbon Fiber Interfacial Adhesion and as an Anchor for “Graft to” Surface Modification Strategies

  • Blinco, James P.
  • Fairfullsmith, Kathryn E.
  • Hendlmeier, Andreas
  • Adcock, Jacqui L.
  • Francis, Paul S.
  • He, Siyuan
  • Walsh, Tiffany R.
  • Henderson, Luke
  • Vuković, Filip
  • Eyckens, Daniel J.
  • Harris, Jessica
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Nitroxide groups covalently grafted to carbon fibers are used as anchoring sites for TEMPO‐terminated polymers (poly‐<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>‐butylacrylate and polystyrene) in a “graft to” surface modification strategy. All surface‐modified fibers are evaluated for their physical properties, showing that several treatments have enhanced the tensile strength and Young's modulus compared to the control fibers. Up to an 18% increase in tensile strength and 12% in Young's modulus are observed. Similarly, the evaluation of interfacial shear strength in an epoxy polymer shows improvements of up to 144% relative to the control sample. Interestingly, the polymer‐grafted surfaces show smaller increases in interfacial shear strength compared to surfaces modified with a small molecule only. This counterintuitive result is attributed to the incompatibility, both chemical and physical, of the grafted polymers to the surrounding epoxy matrix. Molecular dynamics simulations of the interface suggest that the diminished increase in mechanical shear strength observed for the polymer grafted surfaces may be due to the lack of exposed chain ends, whereas the small molecule grafted interface exclusively presents chain ends to the resin interface, resulting in good improvements in mechanical properties.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • simulation
  • molecular dynamics
  • strength
  • tensile strength
  • resin