Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mirmojarabian, Seyed Amir

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 10

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Machine Learning Prediction of Collagen Fiber Orientation and Proteoglycan Content From Multiparametric Quantitative MRI in Articular Cartilage10citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Casula, Victor
1 / 1 shared
Nieminen, Miika T.
1 / 4 shared
Liimatainen, Timo
1 / 1 shared
Nykänen, Olli
1 / 4 shared
Nissi, Mikko J.
1 / 3 shared
Ketola, Juuso H. J.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Casula, Victor
  • Nieminen, Miika T.
  • Liimatainen, Timo
  • Nykänen, Olli
  • Nissi, Mikko J.
  • Ketola, Juuso H. J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Machine Learning Prediction of Collagen Fiber Orientation and Proteoglycan Content From Multiparametric Quantitative MRI in Articular Cartilage

  • Casula, Victor
  • Nieminen, Miika T.
  • Liimatainen, Timo
  • Nykänen, Olli
  • Nissi, Mikko J.
  • Ketola, Juuso H. J.
  • Mirmojarabian, Seyed Amir
Abstract

<p>Background: Machine learning models trained with multiparametric quantitative MRIs (qMRIs) have the potential to provide valuable information about the structural composition of articular cartilage. Purpose: To study the performance and feasibility of machine learning models combined with qMRIs for noninvasive assessment of collagen fiber orientation and proteoglycan content. Study Type: Retrospective, animal model. Animal Model: An open-source single slice MRI dataset obtained from 20 samples of 10 Shetland ponies (seven with surgically induced cartilage lesions followed by treatment and three healthy controls) yielded to 1600 data points, including 10% for test and 90% for train validation. Field Strength/Sequence: A 9.4 T MRI scanner/qMRI sequences: T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, adiabatic T<sub>1ρ</sub> and T<sub>2ρ</sub>, continuous-wave T<sub>1ρ</sub> and relaxation along a fictitious field (T<sub>RAFF</sub>) maps. Assessment: Five machine learning regression models were developed: random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), gradient boosting (GB), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and Gaussian process regression (GPR). A nested cross-validation was used for performance evaluation. For reference, proteoglycan content and collagen fiber orientation were determined by quantitative histology from digital densitometry (DD) and polarized light microscopy (PLM), respectively. Statistical Tests: Normality was tested using Shapiro–Wilk test, and association between predicted and measured values was evaluated using Spearman's Rho test. A P-value of 0.05 was considered as the limit of statistical significance. Results: Four out of the five models (RF, GB, MLP, and GPR) yielded high accuracy (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.68–0.75 for PLM and 0.62–0.66 for DD), and strong significant correlations between the reference measurements and predicted cartilage matrix properties (Spearman's Rho = 0.72–0.88 for PLM and 0.61–0.83 for DD). GPR algorithm had the highest accuracy (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75 and 0.66) and lowest prediction-error (root mean squared [RMSE] = 1.34 and 2.55) for PLM and DD, respectively. Data Conclusion: Multiparametric qMRIs in combination with regression models can determine cartilage compositional and structural features, with higher accuracy for collagen fiber orientation than proteoglycan content. Evidence Level: 2. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.</p>

Topics
  • strength
  • random
  • machine learning
  • Polarized light microscopy