People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Foghmoes, Søren Preben Vagn
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2020Surface treatments and functionalization of metal‐ceramic membranes for improved enzyme immobilization performancecitations
- 2018Citrate- and glycerol triesters as novel dual-functional dispersants and plasticisers for ceramic processingcitations
- 2017Development of redox stable, multifunctional substrates for anode supported SOFCS
- 2016Complementary analysis techniques applied on optimizing suspensions of yttria stabilized zirconiacitations
- 2016Design and optimization of porous ceramic supports for asymmetric ceria-based oxygen transport membranescitations
- 2016Design and optimization of porous ceramic supports for asymmetric ceria-based oxygen transport membranescitations
- 2016Novel ceramic processing method for substitution of toxic plasticizerscitations
- 2014Densification and grain growth kinetics of Ce 0.9 Gd 0.1 O 1.95 in tape cast layers: The influence of porositycitations
- 2014In situ characterization of delamination and crack growth of a CGO–LSM multi-layer ceramic sample investigated by X-ray tomographic microscopycitations
- 2014Densification and grain growth kinetics of Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 in tape cast layers: The influence of porositycitations
- 2013Sintering process optimization for multi-layer CGO membranes by in situ techniquescitations
- 2013The effect of forming stresses on the sintering of ultra-fine Ce0.9Gd0.1O2-δ powderscitations
- 2012Durable and Robust Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- 2011Evaluation of thin film ceria membranes for syngas membrane reactors—Preparation, characterization and testingcitations
- 2011On the use of supported ceria membranes for oxyfuel process/syngas productioncitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Surface treatments and functionalization of metal‐ceramic membranes for improved enzyme immobilization performance
Abstract
Background: Enzyme immobilization in porous membranes often improves enzyme performance. This work reports the preparation and characterization of robust and scalable asymmetric metal‐ceramic microfiltration membrane. The surface of the porous metal‐ceramic membrane was treated by impregnation with a ceramic oxide for enzyme adsorption and corrosion protection. Finally, enzyme immobilization in the support was investigated.<br/><br/>Results: The bilayer membrane was successfully fabricated by combining a ceramic microfiltration layer with a metal support by tape casting, lamination and co‐sintering. A pore size in the ceramic microfiltration layer of 0.4 μm resulted in high water permeability (12000 L/(m<sup>2</sup> h bar)). Two different surface treatments were compared: heat treatment and Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> impregnation. Corrosion stability tests under enzyme‐relevant conditions gave no detectable chemical or structural changes. Alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) was immobilized in the membrane by physical adsorption and by two covalent immobilization methods. Covalent immobilization significantly improved enzyme loading, activity, and recyclability. Membrane reuse by heat treatment removed fouling, but decreased immobilization performance.<br/><br/>Conclusion: he improved microstructure obtained by Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>‐impregnation had a significant effect on enzyme loading yield and activity. This indicates the potential of this surface modification method and of these metal‐supported ceramic membranes in enzyme immobilization. Covalent immobilization was superior.