Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hugten, Pieter P. W. Van

  • Google
  • 2
  • 12
  • 6

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the osseointegration capacity of a polycarbonate-urethane zirconium-oxide composite material for application in a focal knee resurfacing implant3citations
  • 2022Surface texture analysis of different focal knee resurfacing implants after 6 and 12 months in vivo in a goat model3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Oevering, Henk
1 / 1 shared
Welting, Tim J. M.
1 / 1 shared
Van Donkelaar, Corrinus
2 / 2 shared
Jeuken, Ralph M.
1 / 1 shared
Asik, Emin Erkan
2 / 10 shared
Roth, Alex K.
2 / 3 shared
Thies, Jens C.
2 / 3 shared
Emans, Peter J.
1 / 1 shared
Damen, Alicia
1 / 1 shared
Emans, Pieter J.
1 / 2 shared
Ito, Keita
1 / 13 shared
Pastrama, Maria-Ioana
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Oevering, Henk
  • Welting, Tim J. M.
  • Van Donkelaar, Corrinus
  • Jeuken, Ralph M.
  • Asik, Emin Erkan
  • Roth, Alex K.
  • Thies, Jens C.
  • Emans, Peter J.
  • Damen, Alicia
  • Emans, Pieter J.
  • Ito, Keita
  • Pastrama, Maria-Ioana
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the osseointegration capacity of a polycarbonate-urethane zirconium-oxide composite material for application in a focal knee resurfacing implant

  • Oevering, Henk
  • Welting, Tim J. M.
  • Van Donkelaar, Corrinus
  • Jeuken, Ralph M.
  • Hugten, Pieter P. W. Van
  • Asik, Emin Erkan
  • Roth, Alex K.
  • Thies, Jens C.
  • Emans, Peter J.
Abstract

<p>Currently available focal knee resurfacing implants (FKRIs) are fully or partially composed of metals, which show a large disparity in elastic modulus relative to bone and cartilage tissue. Although titanium is known for its excellent osseointegration, the application in FKRIs can lead to potential stress-shielding and metal implants can cause degeneration of the opposing articulating cartilage due to the high resulting contact stresses. Furthermore, metal implants do not allow for follow-up using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).To overcome the drawbacks of using metal based FKRIs, a biomimetic and MRI compatible bi-layered non-resorbable thermoplastic polycarbonate-urethane (PCU)-based FKRI was developed. The objective of this preclinical study was to evaluate the mechanical properties, biocompatibility and osteoconduction of a novel Bionate® 75D - zirconium oxide (B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub>) composite material in vitro and the osseointegration of a B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> composite stem PCU implant in a caprine animal model. The tensile strength and elastic modulus of the B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> composite were characterized through in vitro mechanical tests under ambient and physiological conditions. In vitro biocompatibility and osteoconductivity were evaluated by exposing human mesenchymal stem cells to the B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> composite and culturing the cells under osteogenic conditions. Cell activity and mineralization were assessed and compared to Bionate® 75D (B75D) and titanium disks. The in vivo osseointegration of implants containing a B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> stem was compared to implants with a B75D stem and titanium stem in a caprine large animal model. After a follow-up of 6 months, bone histomorphometry was performed to assess the bone-to-implant contact area (BIC). Mechanical testing showed that the B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> composite material possesses an elastic modulus in the range of the elastic modulus reported for trabecular bone. The B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> composite material facilitated cell mediated mineralization to a comparable extent as titanium. A significantly higher bone-to-implant contact (BIC) score was observed in the B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> implants compared to the B75D implants. The BIC of B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> implants was not significantly different compared to titanium implants. A biocompatible B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> composite approximating the elastic modulus of trabecular bone was developed by compounding B75D with zirconium oxide. In vivo evaluation showed an significant increase of osseointegration for B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> composite stem implants compared to B75D polymer stem PCU implants. The osseointegration of B75D-ZrO<sub>2</sub> composite stem PCU implants was not significantly different in comparison to analogous titanium stem metal implants.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • zirconium
  • strength
  • layered
  • composite
  • titanium
  • tensile strength
  • thermoplastic
  • biocompatibility