Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Prinamello, A.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 7
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Characterization of SH‐SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell growth over glass and SU‐8 substrates7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ajetunmobi, A.
1 / 1 shared
Mcallister, D.
1 / 1 shared
Jain, N.
1 / 5 shared
Tropea, Daniela
1 / 1 shared
Corvin, A.
1 / 1 shared
Brazil, O.
1 / 2 shared
Volkov, Y.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ajetunmobi, A.
  • Mcallister, D.
  • Jain, N.
  • Tropea, Daniela
  • Corvin, A.
  • Brazil, O.
  • Volkov, Y.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Characterization of SH‐SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell growth over glass and SU‐8 substrates

  • Ajetunmobi, A.
  • Mcallister, D.
  • Jain, N.
  • Tropea, Daniela
  • Prinamello, A.
  • Corvin, A.
  • Brazil, O.
  • Volkov, Y.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The physical properties of substrates can have profound effects on the structure and function of cultured cells. In this study, we aimed to examine the viability, adherence, and morphological and functional variations between SH‐SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells cultured on SU‐8 surfaces compared with control surfaces composed of borosilicate glass, which are routinely used for cell culture. The SU‐8 polymer has been extensively studied for its biocompatibility, but there has been little investigation into the characteristic differences between cells cultured on SU‐8 when compared with glass. SH‐SY5Y cells were cultured within polydimethylsiloxane wells on both SU‐8 and glass substrates for up to 72 h after which flow cytometry and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay analysis was performed to examine cell viability and neurotoxicity. Immunocytochemistry was also performed to analyze the morphological and functional characteristics of the cells. Atomic force microscopy was performed to measure surface roughness and to map cell–substrate interactions. Nanoindentation testing was used to characterize the mechanical properties of polymer surface. Results showed that SH‐SY5Y cells grown on SU‐8 have significantly improved viability and increased morphological and functional characteristics of neurodevelopment. The results from this study suggest that the mechanical properties of the polymer are optimal for the study of cultured cell lines, which could account for the increased viability, adherence, and morphological and functional characteristics of neurodevelopment. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 2129–2138, 2017.</jats:p>

Topics
  • surface
  • polymer
  • atomic force microscopy
  • glass
  • glass
  • nanoindentation
  • biocompatibility