Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Favi, Pelagie Marlene

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 41

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2015Shape and surface chemistry effects on the cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of metallic nanorods and nanospheres41citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Valencia, Mariana Morales
1 / 1 shared
Restrepo, Alejandro
1 / 1 shared
Gao, Ming
1 / 2 shared
Huang, Hanchen
1 / 1 shared
Pavon, Juan Jose
1 / 1 shared
Webster, Thomas Jay
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Valencia, Mariana Morales
  • Restrepo, Alejandro
  • Gao, Ming
  • Huang, Hanchen
  • Pavon, Juan Jose
  • Webster, Thomas Jay
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Shape and surface chemistry effects on the cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of metallic nanorods and nanospheres

  • Favi, Pelagie Marlene
  • Valencia, Mariana Morales
  • Restrepo, Alejandro
  • Gao, Ming
  • Huang, Hanchen
  • Pavon, Juan Jose
  • Webster, Thomas Jay
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Metallic nanoparticles (such as gold and silver) have been intensely studied for wound healing applications due to their ability to be easily functionalized, possess antibacterial properties, and their strong potential for targeted drug release. In this study, rod‐shaped silver nanorods (AgNRs) and gold nanorods (AuNRs) were fabricated by electron beam physical vapor deposition (EBPVD), and their cytotoxicity toward human skin fibroblasts were assessed and compared to sphere‐shaped silver nanospheres (AgNSs) and gold nanospheres (AuNSs). Results showed that the 39.94 nm AgNSs showed the greatest toxicity with fibroblast cells followed by the 61.06 nm AuNSs, ∼556 nm × 47 nm (11.8:1 aspect ratio) AgNRs, and the ∼534 nm × 65 nm (8.2:1 aspect ratio) AuNRs demonstrated the least amount of toxicity. The calculated IC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> (50% inhibitory concentration) value for the AgNRs exposed to fibroblasts was greater after 4 days of exposure (387.3 μg mL<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) compared to the AgNSs and AuNSs (4.3 and 23.4 μg mL<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, respectively), indicating that these spherical metallic nanoparticles displayed a greater toxicity to fibroblast cells. The IC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> value could not be measured for the AuNRs due to an incomplete dose response curve. The reduced cell toxicity with the presently developed rod‐shaped nanoparticles suggests that they may be promising materials for use in numerous biomedical applications. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 103A: 3940–3955, 2015.</jats:p>

Topics
  • nanoparticle
  • surface
  • silver
  • gold
  • physical vapor deposition
  • toxicity
  • ion chromatography