Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Neumann, Luis

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 37

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Spatial GR4J conceptualization of the Tamor glaciated alpine catchment in Eastern Nepal: Evaluation of GR4JSG against streamflow and MODIS snow extent37citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wahid, Shahriar
1 / 1 shared
Zheng, Hongxing
1 / 3 shared
Nepal, Santosh
1 / 1 shared
Chen, Jie
1 / 12 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wahid, Shahriar
  • Zheng, Hongxing
  • Nepal, Santosh
  • Chen, Jie
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Spatial GR4J conceptualization of the Tamor glaciated alpine catchment in Eastern Nepal: Evaluation of GR4JSG against streamflow and MODIS snow extent

  • Wahid, Shahriar
  • Zheng, Hongxing
  • Neumann, Luis
  • Nepal, Santosh
  • Chen, Jie
Abstract

Snow and glacial melt processes are an important part of the Himalayan water balance. However, quantification of melt runoff depends upon data availability and conceptualization of hydrological models applied. This paper describes in detail an application of conceptual GR4J hydrological model in the Tamor catchment in Eastern Nepal using typical elevation band and degree-day factor approaches to handle Himalayan snow and glacial melt processes. The paper contributes a model conceptualization (GR4JSG) that enables coarse evaluation of modeled snow extents against remotely sensed MODIS snow extent. Novel aspects include the glacial store in GR4JSG and examination of how the parameters controlling snow and glacial stores correlate with existing parameters of GR4J.The model is calibrated using a Bayesian Monte Carlo Markov Chain method against observed streamflow for one glaciated catchment with reliable data. Evaluation of the modelled streamflow with observed streamflow gave Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency of 0.88 and Percent Bias of <4%. Evaluation of the modelled snow extents with MODIS gave R2 (coefficient of determination) of 0.46, with calibration against streamflow only (i.e.without reference to snow extent in calibration). The contribution of melt runoff from the catchment is 15% (including 6% from glacier area).The model is highly sensitive to rainfall and temperature data, which suffer from known problems and biases, for example due to stations being located predominantly in valleys and at lower elevations. Testing of the model in other Himalayan catchments may reveal additional limitations.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • melt