• Paolella, Andrea
• Krammer, Martin
• Proietti, Remo
• Molaiyan, Palanivel
• Marras, Sergio
• Ricci, Marco

Abstract

Aluminum (Al) is one of the most promising active materials for producing next‐generation negative electrodes for lithium (Li)‐ion batteries. It features low density, high specific capacity, and low working potential, making it ideal for producing energy‐dense cells. However, this material loses its electrochemical activity within 100 cycles, making it practically unusable. Several claims in the literature support the idea that a dual degradation mechanism is at play. Firstly, the slow diffusion of Li in the Al matrix causes the electrochemical reactions to be partly irreversible, making the initial capacity of the cell drop. Second, the stresses caused by cycling make the active material pulverize and lose activity. Recent work shows that shortening the diffusion path of Li by 3D structuring is an effective way to mitigate the first capacity loss mechanism, while alloying Al with other elements effectively mitigates the second one. In this work, we demonstrate that the benefits of 3D structuring and alloying are cumulative and that a mesh made of an Al‐magnesium alloy performs better than both a pure Al foil and a foil of an Al‐Mg alloy.</jats:p>

Topics

• density
• impedance spectroscopy
• Magnesium
• magnesium alloy
• Magnesium
• aluminium
• Lithium