Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hofmeyer, Hèrm

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1

Eindhoven University of Technology

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023A pyrolysis model for steel-insulation sandwich building façade systems under fire1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Xu, Qingfeng
1 / 3 shared
Maljaars, Johan
1 / 26 shared
Herpen, Ruud A. P. Van
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Xu, Qingfeng
  • Maljaars, Johan
  • Herpen, Ruud A. P. Van
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

A pyrolysis model for steel-insulation sandwich building façade systems under fire

  • Xu, Qingfeng
  • Hofmeyer, Hèrm
  • Maljaars, Johan
  • Herpen, Ruud A. P. Van
Abstract

Sandwich panels consist of two thin-walled steel faces plus an insulation core. For this core, materials are selected that provide high (shear) stiffness and high thermal resistance. When the panels are subject to fire, the (a) temperature-dependent behaviour of the steel faces and (b) the possible chemical reactions of the insulation core should both be considered, to accurately predict the structural behaviour. Provisions in Eurocode EN 1993-1-2 can be used for (a). Regarding (b), this paper adds a verified pyrolysis model to Heat Transfer (HT) analyses, and obtained results are transferred to a Structural Response (SR) analysis. Then, the HT and SR analyses are demonstrated in so-called One-Way Coupled (OWC) and Two-Way Coupled (TWC) fire-structure simulations, the latter including the effects of structural failure on the fire behaviour. For the cases studied, structural behaviour for OWC and TWC simulations is very similar, which indicates that the structural (failure) behaviour does not significantly influence the fire behaviour. Differently, the difference in failure time between simulations with and without pyrolysis is more than 15%, due to endothermic effects. As such, for the cases studied, modelling of pyrolysis is more important than the effect of structural failures, and this modelling can be included as demonstrated in this paper.

Topics
  • pyrolysis
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • steel