Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Yan, Rui

  • Google
  • 6
  • 6
  • 47

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2023Experimental and numerical study of butt welded joints made of high strength steel1citations
  • 2023Experimental investigation on the tensile behaviour of welded RHS high strength steel X-joints10citations
  • 2023Equivalent material properties of the heat-affected zone in welded cold-formed rectangular hollow section connections14citations
  • 2023Equivalent material properties of the heat-affected zone in welded cold-formed rectangular hollow section connections14citations
  • 2023Tensile behaviour of welded S700 rectangular hollow section X‐jointscitations
  • 2022Fracture simulation of welded RHS X-joints using GTN damage model8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Bamby, Hagar El
4 / 4 shared
Veljkovic, Milan
6 / 32 shared
El Bamby, Hagar
2 / 3 shared
Mela, Kristo
4 / 17 shared
Yang, Fei
2 / 4 shared
Xin, Haohui
1 / 10 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Bamby, Hagar El
  • Veljkovic, Milan
  • El Bamby, Hagar
  • Mela, Kristo
  • Yang, Fei
  • Xin, Haohui
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Tensile behaviour of welded S700 rectangular hollow section X‐joints

  • Bamby, Hagar El
  • Yan, Rui
  • Veljkovic, Milan
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>High‐strength steels (HSS) have higher strength but lower ductility compared to mild steels. A material factor (<jats:italic>C</jats:italic><jats:sub>f</jats:sub>) and a 0.8<jats:italic>f</jats:italic><jats:sub>u</jats:sub> restriction on the material design yield strength (<jats:italic>f</jats:italic><jats:sub>y</jats:sub>) are stipulated to reduce the design resistance of welded HSS hollow section joints in the newest version of prEN 1993‐1‐8 (2022), given the low ductility of HSS and a limited number of experiments on welded HSS joints. However, applying the material factor and the yield strength restriction partially eliminates the benefits of using HSS, limiting its competitiveness. Besides, the type of the weld (fillet weld or butt weld), which is not distinguished in the design rules in prEN 1993‐1‐8 (2022), may influence the mechanical behaviour of the joint. Hence, in this paper, a parametric study is carried out based on the validated Gurson‐Tvergaard‐Needleman (GTN) damage model and the validated finite element (FE) model of two X‐joints in literature. The effect of two parameters, the brace width to chord width ratio (<jats:italic>β</jats:italic>) and the weld dimension, on the tensile behaviour of the welded S700 rectangular hollow section (RHS) X‐joint are evaluated. The FE results are compared to the prEN 1993‐1‐8 prediction, and the necessity of <jats:italic>C</jats:italic><jats:sub>f</jats:sub> and the 0.8<jats:italic>f</jats:italic><jats:sub>u</jats:sub> yield strength restriction is evaluated.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • strength
  • yield strength
  • ductility
  • high speed steel