Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Saleh, David

  • Google
  • 2
  • 11
  • 75

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Standardized method for mechanistic modeling of multimodal anion exchange chromatography in flow through operation16citations
  • 2020Straightforward method for calibration of mechanistic cation exchange chromatography models for industrial applications59citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Schwab, Thomas
1 / 11 shared
Wang, Gang
2 / 23 shared
Hess, Rudger
1 / 1 shared
Yun, Doil
1 / 1 shared
Grosch, Jan-Hendrik
1 / 1 shared
Hubbuch, Jürgen
2 / 12 shared
Briskot, Till
1 / 1 shared
Rischawy, Federico
1 / 1 shared
Kluters, Simon
1 / 1 shared
Studts, Joey
1 / 1 shared
Müller, Benedict
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Schwab, Thomas
  • Wang, Gang
  • Hess, Rudger
  • Yun, Doil
  • Grosch, Jan-Hendrik
  • Hubbuch, Jürgen
  • Briskot, Till
  • Rischawy, Federico
  • Kluters, Simon
  • Studts, Joey
  • Müller, Benedict
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Straightforward method for calibration of mechanistic cation exchange chromatography models for industrial applications

  • Rischawy, Federico
  • Kluters, Simon
  • Saleh, David
  • Studts, Joey
  • Wang, Gang
  • Hubbuch, Jürgen
  • Müller, Benedict
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Mechanistic modeling of chromatography processes is one of the most promising techniques for the digitalization of biopharmaceutical process development. Possible applications of chromatography models range from in silico process optimization in early phase development to in silico root cause investigation during manufacturing. Nonetheless, the cumbersome and complex model calibration still decelerates the implementation of mechanistic modeling in industry. Therefore, the industry demands model calibration strategies that ensure adequate model certainty in a limited amount of time. This study introduces a directed and straightforward approach for the calibration of pH‐dependent, multicomponent steric mass action (SMA) isotherm models for industrial applications. In the case investigated, the method was applied to a monoclonal antibody (mAb) polishing step including four protein species. The developed strategy combined well‐established theories of preparative chromatography (e.g. Yamamoto method) and allowed a systematic reduction of unknown model parameters to 7 from initially 32. Model uncertainty was reduced by designing two representative calibration experiments for the inverse estimation of remaining model parameters. Dedicated experiments with aggregate‐enriched load material led to a significant reduction of model uncertainty for the estimates of this low‐concentrated product‐related impurity. The model was validated beyond the operating ranges of the final unit operation, enabling its application to late‐stage downstream process development. With the proposed model calibration strategy, a systematic experimental design is provided, calibration effort is strongly reduced, and local minima are avoided.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • phase
  • experiment
  • polishing
  • chromatography