Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Oconnell, Deborah

  • Google
  • 5
  • 33
  • 157

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2018Approach and methods for co-producing a systems understanding of disaster: Technical Report Supporting the Development of the Australian Vulnerability Profilecitations
  • 2015Quantifying spatial dependencies, trade-offs and uncertainty in bioenergy costs: an Australian case study (2) – National supply curves4citations
  • 2015The Resilience, Adaptation and Transformation Assessment Framework: From Theory to Applicationcitations
  • 2012An assessment of biomass for bioelectricity and biofuel, and for greenhouse gas emission reduction in Australia97citations
  • 2008Electrical, structural, and chemical properties of HfO₂ films formed by electron beam evaporation56citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Williams, Rachel
1 / 1 shared
Wise, Russ
1 / 1 shared
Meyers, Jacqui
1 / 1 shared
Meharg, Seona
1 / 1 shared
Edwards, Jill
1 / 1 shared
Osuchowski, Monica
1 / 1 shared
Crosweller, Mark
1 / 1 shared
Abel, Nick
1 / 1 shared
Walker, Brian
1 / 1 shared
Braid, Andrew
1 / 1 shared
Rodriguez, Luis
1 / 1 shared
Kriticos, Darren
1 / 1 shared
Campbell, Peter
1 / 1 shared
Taylor, Joely
1 / 1 shared
Jovanovic, Tom
1 / 1 shared
Crawford, Debbie
1 / 1 shared
Herr, Alexander Herr - Herry
1 / 1 shared
Poole, Michael
1 / 2 shared
May, Barrie
1 / 1 shared
Oconnor, Mike
1 / 1 shared
Raison, John
1 / 1 shared
Farine, Damien
1 / 1 shared
Bailey, P.
1 / 11 shared
Hurley, Paul K.
1 / 2 shared
Monaghan, S.
1 / 3 shared
Modreanu, M.
1 / 3 shared
Noakes, T. C. Q.
1 / 10 shared
Mcdonnell, Stephen
1 / 2 shared
Barklie, R. C.
1 / 10 shared
Negara, M. A.
1 / 1 shared
Cherkaoui, K.
1 / 3 shared
Wright, S.
1 / 1 shared
Hughes, Greg
1 / 13 shared
Chart of publication period
2018
2015
2012
2008

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Williams, Rachel
  • Wise, Russ
  • Meyers, Jacqui
  • Meharg, Seona
  • Edwards, Jill
  • Osuchowski, Monica
  • Crosweller, Mark
  • Abel, Nick
  • Walker, Brian
  • Braid, Andrew
  • Rodriguez, Luis
  • Kriticos, Darren
  • Campbell, Peter
  • Taylor, Joely
  • Jovanovic, Tom
  • Crawford, Debbie
  • Herr, Alexander Herr - Herry
  • Poole, Michael
  • May, Barrie
  • Oconnor, Mike
  • Raison, John
  • Farine, Damien
  • Bailey, P.
  • Hurley, Paul K.
  • Monaghan, S.
  • Modreanu, M.
  • Noakes, T. C. Q.
  • Mcdonnell, Stephen
  • Barklie, R. C.
  • Negara, M. A.
  • Cherkaoui, K.
  • Wright, S.
  • Hughes, Greg
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Quantifying spatial dependencies, trade-offs and uncertainty in bioenergy costs: an Australian case study (2) – National supply curves

  • Oconnell, Deborah
Abstract

aA biophysically constrained economic analysis of several alternative prospective pathways for biofuel production in Australiafrom crop residues (stubble), a lignocellulosic feedstock develops. N national supply cost curves are developed. As well as considering biofuels suitable for replacing the fuels currently used in land (and sea) transport suitable biofuels, we also consider electricity, and aviation biofuels.In a companion paper (1), bBiofuel production costs, dependent onhave been estimated as a function of the spatial concentration of available feedstock, are derived in a companion paper by selecting a cost minimising production scale that trades off processing and transport costs. Lower concentrations correspond to smaller processing plants, larger and greater collection areas, and greater costs. These biofuel costs are not calculated by a priori assumption of processing plant size, such as that based on scales at which similarly-produced fossil-based fuels are competitive in the contemporary economic environment. Instead they are based on minimising regional production cost by trading off between processing and transport costsOver the spatial scales corresponding to those within the collection areas required for least cost supply, variation in the concentration of crop residue feedstock is quite modest. From any Any given candidate production plant location, can be associated with a collection distance area can easily be found that approximates the least cost distance for itsthe average spatial concentration within the associated collection area, because feedstock concentration varies only modestly within cost minimising area scales. This permits the identification of aA set of plant locations, scales,, each associated with an and approximately near to least-cost collection areas is found, that in aggregate collectively service all the available feedstock. Corresponding national supply cost curves that are derived from such analysis are then also close to least cost. We apply the above approachThis is applied to Australian data, generating upper and lower bounds on nationally aggregated supply cost curves.In practice, tThe sizing of biofuel production facilities is also likely influenced by severalwill be also affected by investment scale commercial considerations including such as the reliability of feedstock supply and investor appetite for risk:, both of which also depend on investment scale. These latter issues these are discussed in a qualitatively manner.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy