Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Magri, Anouar El

  • Google
  • 2
  • 6
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Numerical and experimental investigation of quasi-static indentation response of PVC foam sandwich and GFRP laminated composites2citations
  • 2023Optimization through response surface methodology of <scp>3D</scp> printed membrane preparation conditions for use in vanadium redox flow battery: A vanadium/proton selectivity study5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hasnaoui, Mohamed El
1 / 2 shared
Zniker, Houcine
1 / 1 shared
Feddal, Ikram
1 / 3 shared
Kouifat, Mohammed Khalil El
1 / 1 shared
Vaudreuil, Sébastien
1 / 3 shared
Thiam, Baye Gueye
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hasnaoui, Mohamed El
  • Zniker, Houcine
  • Feddal, Ikram
  • Kouifat, Mohammed Khalil El
  • Vaudreuil, Sébastien
  • Thiam, Baye Gueye
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Optimization through response surface methodology of <scp>3D</scp> printed membrane preparation conditions for use in vanadium redox flow battery: A vanadium/proton selectivity study

  • Vaudreuil, Sébastien
  • Thiam, Baye Gueye
  • Magri, Anouar El
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>SPEEK membrane applicable in Vanadium Redox Flow Battery (VRFB) have been 3D printed via Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). Response Surface Methodology (RSM) has been used to optimize conditions for 3D printing membrane. Good membranes characteristics were obtained by manipulating three parameters, namely the printing temperature, the orientation of the printing layer and the sulfonation time. We evaluated the effects of these three variables on the permeability of membranes to protons and vanadium ions. Results have shown that sulfonation is the most significant variable influencing vanadium and proton permeability. The optimal printing conditions were found at 408°C temperature with a horizontal layer orientation, while the best sulfonation is obtained at 6 min. The optimal membrane has an ion exchange capacity of 0.86 mmolg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, a water uptake ratio of 22%, a VO<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> permeability of 6.1 × 10<jats:sup>−8</jats:sup> cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, a H<jats:sup>+</jats:sup> permeability of 7.0 × 10<jats:sup>−6</jats:sup> cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, excellent mechanical stability and better H<jats:sup>+</jats:sup>/VO<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> perm selectivity than conventional sulfonated polyether ether ketone (SPEEK), Fap450 and Nafion211 membranes. The above results show that the 3D‐SPEEK membrane has great advantages and broad prospects for VRFB applications.</jats:p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • permeability
  • ketone
  • vanadium