People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Yadav, Ashok
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (2/2 displayed)
- 2023Electrically Conductive π‐Intercalated Graphitic Metal‐Organic Framework Containing Alternate π‐Donor/Acceptor Stackscitations
- 2021Effects of intervalence charge transfer interaction between π-stacked mixed valent tetrathiafulvalene ligands on the electrical conductivity of 3D metal–organic frameworkscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Electrically Conductive π‐Intercalated Graphitic Metal‐Organic Framework Containing Alternate π‐Donor/Acceptor Stacks
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Two‐dimensional graphitic metal–organic frameworks (GMOF) often display impressive electrical conductivity chiefly due to efficient through‐bond in‐plane charge transport, however, less efficient out‐of‐plane conduction across the stacked layers creates large disparity between two orthogonal conduction pathways and dampens their bulk conductivity. To address this issue and engineer higher bulk conductivity in 2D GMOFs, we have constructed via an elegant bottom‐up method the first π‐intercalated GMOF (iGMOF1) featuring built‐in alternate π‐donor/acceptor (π‐D/A) stacks of Cu<jats:sup>II</jats:sup>‐coordinated electron‐rich hexaaminotriphenylene (HATP) ligands and non‐coordinatively intercalated π‐acidic hexacyano‐triphenylene (HCTP) molecules, which facilitated out‐of‐plane charge transport while the hexagonal Cu<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>(HATP)<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> scaffold maintained in‐plane conduction. As a result, iGMOF1 attained an order of magnitude higher bulk electrical conductivity and much smaller activation energy than Cu<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>(HATP)<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> (σ=25 vs. 2 S m<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, <jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub>a</jats:sub>=36 vs. 65 meV), demostrating that simultaneous in‐plane (through‐bond) and out‐of‐plane (through πD/A stacks) charge transport can generate higher electrical conductivity in novel iGMOFs.</jats:p>