People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Rurali, Riccardo
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (12/12 displayed)
- 2024A Universal, Highly Stable Dopant System for Organic Semiconductors Based on Lewis-Paired Dopant Complexes
- 2024Lead-free room-temperature ferroelectric thermal conductivity switch using anisotropies in thermal conductivities
- 2024On The Thermal Conductivity of Conjugated Polymers for Thermoelectricscitations
- 2023Giant multiphononic effects in a perovskite oxidecitations
- 2022Phonon Transport in GaAs and InAs Twinning Superlatticescitations
- 2022Phonon Transport in GaAs and InAs Twinning Superlatticescitations
- 2021Highly Biaxially Strained Silicene on Au(111)
- 2021Unveiling Planar Defects in Hexagonal Group IV Materials
- 2021Unveiling Planar Defects in Hexagonal Group IV Materialscitations
- 2020Doping of III–V Arsenide and Phosphide Wurtzite Semiconductorscitations
- 2020Doping of III-V Arsenide and Phosphide Wurtzite Semiconductorscitations
- 2018Impact of pore anisotropy on the thermal conductivity of porous Si nanowires
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
On The Thermal Conductivity of Conjugated Polymers for Thermoelectrics
Abstract
he thermal conductivity (κ) governs how heat propagates in a material, and thus is a key parameter that constrains the lifetime of optoelectronic devices and the performance of thermoelectrics (TEs). In organic electronics, understanding what determines κ has been elusive and experimentally challenging. Here, by measuring κ in 17 π‐conjugated materials over different spatial directions, it is statistically shown how microstructure unlocks two markedly different thermal transport regimes. κ in long‐range ordered polymers follows standard thermal transport theories: improved ordering implies higher κ and increased anisotropy. κ increases with stiffer backbones, higher molecular weights and heavier repeat units. Therein, charge and thermal transport go hand‐in‐hand and can be decoupled solely via the film texture, as supported by molecular dynamics simulations. In largely amorphous polymers, however, κ correlates negatively with the persistence length and the mass of the repeat unit, and thus an anomalous, albeit useful, behavior is found. Importantly, it is shown that for quasi‐amorphous co‐polymers (e.g., IDT‐BT) κ decreases with increasing charge mobility, yielding a 10‐fold enhancement of the TE figure‐of‐merit ZT compared to semi‐crystalline counterparts (under comparable electrical conductivities). Finally, specific material design rules for high and low κ in organic semiconductors are provided.