| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Fuchs, Till
University of Giessen
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (14/14 displayed)
- 2024SEI growth on Lithium metal anodes in solid-state batteries quantified with coulometric titration time analysis
- 2023Non‐Linear Kinetics of The Lithium Metal Anode on Li6PS5Cl at High Current Density: Dendrite Growth and the Role of Lithium Microstructure on Creepcitations
- 2023Overcoming Anode Instability in Solid‐State Batteries through Control of the Lithium Metal Microstructurecitations
- 2023Current‐Dependent Lithium Metal Growth Modes in “Anode‐Free” Solid‐State Batteries at the Cu|LLZO Interfacecitations
- 2023SEI growth on Lithium metal anodes in solid-state batteries quantified with coulometric titration time analysiscitations
- 2023Kinetics and Pore Formation of the Sodium Metal Anode on NASICON‐Type Na$_{3.4}$ Zr$_2$Si$_{2.4}$P$_{0.6}$O$_{12}$ for Sodium Solid‐State Batteries
- 2023Morphological Challenges at the Interface of Lithium Metal and Electrolytes in Garnet-type Solid-State Batteries
- 2023Deposition of Sodium Metal at the Copper‐NaSICON Interface for Reservoir‐Free Solid‐State Sodium Batteriescitations
- 2023Evaluating the Use of Critical Current Density Tests of Symmetric Lithium Transference Cells with Solid Electrolytescitations
- 2022In Situ Investigation of Lithium Metal–Solid Electrolyte Anode Interfaces with ToF‐SIMScitations
- 2022Increasing the Pressure‐Free Stripping Capacity of the Lithium Metal Anode in Solid‐State‐Batteries by Carbon Nanotubescitations
- 2022Kinetics and Pore Formation of the Sodium Metal Anode on NASICON‐Type Na$_{3.4}$ Zr$_2$Si$_{2.4}$P$_{0.6}$O$_{12}$ for Sodium Solid‐State Batteriescitations
- 2022Morphological Challenges at the Interface of Lithium Metal and Electrolytes in Garnet-type Solid-State Batteries
- 2021Working principle of an ionic liquid interlayer during pressureless lithium stripping on Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) garnet‐type solid electrolytecitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Deposition of Sodium Metal at the Copper‐NaSICON Interface for Reservoir‐Free Solid‐State Sodium Batteries
Abstract
“Anode-free” solid-state battery concepts are explored extensively as they promise a higher energy density with less material consumption and simple anode processing. Here, the homogeneous and uniform electrochemical deposition of alkali metal at the interface between current collector and solid electrolyte plays the central role to form a metal anode within the first cycle. While the cathodic deposition of lithium has been studied intensively, knowledge on sodium deposition is scarce. In this work, dense and uniform sodium layers of several microns thickness are deposited at the Cu|Na$_{3.4}$Zr$_2$Si$_{2.4}$P$_{0.6}$O$_{12}$ interface with high reproducibility. At current densities of ≈1 mA∙cm$^{−2}$, relatively uniform coverage is achieved underneath the current collector, as shown by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and 3D confocal microscopy. In contrast, only slight variations of the coverage are observed at different stack pressures. Early stages of the sodium metal growth are analyzed by in situ transmission electron microscopy revealing oriented growth of sodium. The results demonstrate that reservoir-free (“anode-free”) sodium-based batteries are feasible and may stimulate further research efforts in sodium-based solid-state batteries.