• Boonchuay, Suphawich
• Noppakhun, Jakapob
• Setasuban, Sorawee
• Praserthdam, Supareak
• Khajondetchairit, Patcharaporn
• Ektarawong, Annop
• Alling, Björn
• Aumnongpho, Nuttanon

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The water‐gas shift reaction (WGSR) is employed in industry to obtain high‐purity H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> from syngas, where H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O adsorption is an important step that controls H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O dissociation in WGSR. Therefore, exploring catalysts exhibiting strong H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O adsorption energy (<jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub>ads</jats:sub>) is crucial. Also, high‐entropy alloys (HEA) are promising materials utilized as catalysts, including in WGSR. The PtPd‐based HEA catalysts are explored via density functional theory (DFT) and Gaussian process regression. The input features are based on the microstructure data and electronic properties: d‐band center (<jats:italic>ε</jats:italic><jats:sub>d</jats:sub>) and Bader net atomic charge (<jats:italic>δ</jats:italic>). The DFT calculation reveals that the <jats:italic>ε</jats:italic><jats:sub>d</jats:sub> and <jats:italic>δ</jats:italic> of each active site of all HEA surfaces are broadly scattered, indicating that the electronic properties of each atom on HEA are non‐uniform and influenced by neighboring atoms. The strong H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O‐active‐site interaction determined by a highly negative <jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub>ads</jats:sub> is used as a criterion to explore good PtPd‐based WGSR catalyst candidates. As a result, the potential candidates are found to have Co, Ru, and Fe as an H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O adsorption site with Ag as a neighboring atom, that is, PtPdRhAgCo, PtPdRuAgCo, PtPdRhAgFe, and PtPdRuAgFe.</jats:p>

Topics

• density
• impedance spectroscopy
• microstructure
• surface
• theory
• density functional theory
• machine learning