People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Fuchs, Till
University of Giessen
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (14/14 displayed)
- 2024SEI growth on Lithium metal anodes in solid-state batteries quantified with coulometric titration time analysis
- 2023Non‐Linear Kinetics of The Lithium Metal Anode on Li6PS5Cl at High Current Density: Dendrite Growth and the Role of Lithium Microstructure on Creepcitations
- 2023Overcoming Anode Instability in Solid‐State Batteries through Control of the Lithium Metal Microstructurecitations
- 2023Current‐Dependent Lithium Metal Growth Modes in “Anode‐Free” Solid‐State Batteries at the Cu|LLZO Interfacecitations
- 2023SEI growth on Lithium metal anodes in solid-state batteries quantified with coulometric titration time analysiscitations
- 2023Kinetics and Pore Formation of the Sodium Metal Anode on NASICON‐Type Na$_{3.4}$ Zr$_2$Si$_{2.4}$P$_{0.6}$O$_{12}$ for Sodium Solid‐State Batteries
- 2023Morphological Challenges at the Interface of Lithium Metal and Electrolytes in Garnet-type Solid-State Batteries
- 2023Deposition of Sodium Metal at the Copper‐NaSICON Interface for Reservoir‐Free Solid‐State Sodium Batteriescitations
- 2023Evaluating the Use of Critical Current Density Tests of Symmetric Lithium Transference Cells with Solid Electrolytescitations
- 2022In Situ Investigation of Lithium Metal–Solid Electrolyte Anode Interfaces with ToF‐SIMScitations
- 2022Increasing the Pressure‐Free Stripping Capacity of the Lithium Metal Anode in Solid‐State‐Batteries by Carbon Nanotubescitations
- 2022Kinetics and Pore Formation of the Sodium Metal Anode on NASICON‐Type Na$_{3.4}$ Zr$_2$Si$_{2.4}$P$_{0.6}$O$_{12}$ for Sodium Solid‐State Batteriescitations
- 2022Morphological Challenges at the Interface of Lithium Metal and Electrolytes in Garnet-type Solid-State Batteries
- 2021Working principle of an ionic liquid interlayer during pressureless lithium stripping on Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) garnet‐type solid electrolytecitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
In Situ Investigation of Lithium Metal–Solid Electrolyte Anode Interfaces with ToF‐SIMS
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Solid‐state batteries with a lithium metal anode (LMA) are promising candidates for the next generation of energy storage systems with high energy and power density. However, successful implementation of the LMA requires deeper insight into the lithium metal–solid electrolyte (Li|SE) interface. Since lithium is highly reactive, reaction products form when it comes into contact with most solid electrolytes (SEs) and the resulting interphase can have detrimental effects on cell performance. To better understand the formation of interphases, Li|SE interfaces are studied with time‐of‐flight secondary‐ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS), which provides chemical information with high sensitivity in 2D as well as 3D and is a valuable complement to commonly used techniques. To investigate the interphase, lithium is deposited in situ on SE pellets either through lithium vapor deposition or electrochemical lithium plating. Subsequent depth profiling provides information about the stability of the Li|SE interface and about the microstructure of the formed interphase. At the Li|Li<jats:sub>6</jats:sub>PS<jats:sub>5</jats:sub>Cl interface of lithium metal with argyrodite‐type Li<jats:sub>6</jats:sub>PS<jats:sub>5</jats:sub>Cl, an apparently covering Li<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>S‐rich layer is found as major part of the interphase. Independent of the deposition method, a combination of ToF‐SIMS and atomic force microscopy indicates a thickness of about 250 nm for the Li<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>S‐rich interlayer.</jats:p>